Does new law tilt Israel away from its democratic values?
| Tel Aviv
The reaction to Israel鈥檚 defining new law, akin to a constitutional amendment, could not have been more starkly divided.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who heads a coalition government considered to be the most right-wing in Israel鈥檚 history, called the newly minted law a 鈥渓andmark,鈥� and posed for a celebratory selfie in the parliamentary chamber. Elsewhere in the building, Israeli-Arab lawmakers tore copies of the legislation to shreds.
The split-screen reaction at the Knesset last Thursday followed immediately after the parliament narrowly passed legislation that enshrined the state of Israel as an exclusively Jewish national project.
Why We Wrote This
In the decades since Israel's creation, the nation's leaders have sought to preserve a balance between what one author calls its "two nonnegotiable identities," as a Jewish, but also democratic, state. A new law, say critics, has upset that balance.
Hailed by supporters as long overdue, and derided by detractors as harmful or unnecessary at best, the legislation brings the decades-long tension between Israel as a democracy and as a Jewish state to a full boil.
Dubbed, 鈥淏asic Law: ,鈥� the legislation elevates the status of Hebrew over Arabic, encourages 鈥淛ewish settlement,鈥� and omits any reference to democracy or equality for Israel鈥檚 Arab minority, who are 20 percent of the population.
听
鈥淭his is a stab in the back,鈥欌�� says Kamal Adwan, editor of 鈥淗ona,鈥� a newspaper of the Druze community, which, unlike most Israeli Arab groups, sends its high school graduates to serve in the Israeli army.
鈥淭his law doesn鈥檛 give equality to citizens of the country, and classifies them according to different levels of citizenship,鈥� he says. 鈥淭he Druze community has always considered itself part of the state. Suddenly, it discovers it鈥檚 a second-class citizen.鈥�
Mohammed Dawarshe, an Arab activist who works for co-existence with Israeli Jews, says he learned about democracy and equal rights in political science courses at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, adding that the nation-state bill upends those notions.
鈥淭his is a downgrading. I considered myself as a citizen, and that Israel is my state,鈥欌�� he said. 鈥淭oday the state says to me, 鈥業 am not your state.鈥� I feel stateless, a political orphan who has buried his political father. It鈥檚 a sad development for me and my community.鈥�
At first glance, the law seemingly states the obvious: It enshrines the country鈥檚 national anthem, establishes the Star of David banner with blue and white as Israel鈥檚 official flag, and reaffirms Israel鈥檚 Law of Return granting Jews outside of Israel automatic citizenship if they immigrate.
But there are some new wrinkles that many say formalize a hierarchy between Jews and Arabs. The law declares that the 鈥渞ight to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.鈥� Hebrew is recognized as the language of the state while Arabic, which had been an official language alongside Hebrew since the years preceding Israel鈥檚 establishment, is designated as a language with a special status. Another clause embraces 鈥淛ewish settlement鈥� as a 鈥渘ational value鈥� 鈥� this was watered down from a previous version that endorsed segregated towns.
The omissions of the law are significant as well, say critics. The bill makes no mention of the rights of the country鈥檚 Arab minority, nor does it discuss the principle of equality, or refer to Israel鈥檚 democratic system of government. The influence of the legislation is all the more potent because of its status as one of 15 鈥渂asic laws鈥� that establish constitutional government institutions and legal values.
Though the law has little immediate practical impact, Israeli critics say it will poison already-strained relations between Arabs and Jews, and potentially inspire undemocratic laws and exclusivist judicial rulings in the future.
'What do we need this for?'
鈥淚srael is the nation-state of the Jewish people without this law, and this is accepted by the countries of the world; so what do we need this for?鈥� says Yedidia Stern, a law professor at Bar-Ilan University. 鈥淪upreme Court judges of the next generation will be able to say that equality isn鈥檛 secured [constitutionally] on the highest level, whereas the Jewish character is secured on the highest level.鈥�
Tzipi Livni, a former Israeli foreign minister whose political career started in Mr. Netanyahu鈥檚 Likud party, tweeted that passage of the law has effectively made the notion of 鈥渄emocracy鈥� into a profanity.
The same concern underpinned pointed statements by some mainstream US Jewish groups that criticized the bill. The American Jewish Committee (AJC) said it was 鈥渄eeply disappointed鈥� by the parliament鈥檚 passage of the law and said it was 鈥渦nnecessary.鈥� The law 鈥減uts at risk鈥� Israeli efforts to build a democracy, the AJC said.
鈥淭here is a prevailing sense that the bill short-changed democratic values, and there is a fear it will harm Jewish-Arab relations, which American Jewry is deeply invested in,鈥欌�� wrote Scott Lasensky, a former US diplomat during the Obama administration. 鈥淥n top of that, and more tactically, there is a general sense that the bill will make it more challenging to defend Israel.鈥�
US Jewish groups also believe the law could be interpreted to formalize discrimination by Israel鈥檚 Orthodox religious establishment against liberal Jewish streams.
Jewish self-determination
From the moment of the nation鈥檚 founding, Israelis have struggled to strike a balance between two seemingly contradictory values: the country鈥檚 raison d鈥櫭猼re as a homeland for the Jews and an aspiration to a democracy that ensures equal rights to all its citizens. Those values are enumerated in Israel鈥檚 Declaration of Independence from 1948, but they were never codified in a formal constitution.
Avraham Diskin, a professor of political science at Hebrew University and a longtime proponent of the bill, says the legislation is necessary to establish a right to self-determination for Jews. While values of democracy, equality, and human rights are enshrined in other Israeli basic laws, like 鈥�,鈥� the Jewish character of the country had been ignored, he says.
鈥淭he only people in the world who are denied the right of self-determination are the Jewish people, even if the Jewish people are willing to recognize the rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination,鈥欌�� Professor Diskin says. The nation-state basic law was also necessary to serve as a judicial counterweight to basic laws that emphasize democracy and human rights.
During the debate before the bill鈥檚 passage, one of its main sponsors, Avi Dichter, a member of the Likud and chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, offered a more provocative defense, saying the legislation鈥檚 purpose is to snuff out the demands of Arab citizens to establish a 鈥渟tate of all its citizens.鈥欌�� That concept has become a bane of the Israeli right wing because it purportedly would denude Israel of a Jewish character.
鈥淵ou weren鈥檛 here before us, and you won鈥檛 remain here after us. All you can do is to live as a national minority among us,鈥欌�� said Dichter in the plenum, addressing Arab colleagues. 鈥淲e are passing this bill in order to avoid even a scrap of thought or effort, to turn Israel into a state of all its citizens.鈥欌��
Global trend
Observers said the law, which had passed through numerous iterations and versions over nearly a decade, reflects Netanyahu鈥檚 demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state in peace negotiations. Israeli right-wingers complain that if the international community supports a Palestinian state, then it should recognize Israel as a state of the Jewish people.
According to some critics, the new basic law is part of an international trend of ascendant nativist nationalist forces in both Europe and the US that seek to curtail some of the universalist political traditions in their respective countries. Moreover, with the solid backing of the Trump administration, Israel鈥檚 government has felt it had more latitude to enact such nationalist reforms.
鈥淲e are in a struggle like many other countries to preserve our democratic culture,鈥欌�� says Yossi Klein Halevi, author of the book 鈥淟etter to My Palestinian Neighbor鈥� and a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem. Although Israel鈥檚 democracy hasn鈥檛 been dismantled, Mr. Halevi says, the basic law is provocative and lacks sensitivity to Arab citizens.
鈥淚srael is based on two non-negotiable identities,鈥欌�� he says. 鈥淭he homeland of all Jews, whether or not they are citizens of Israel, and it鈥檚 the state of all its citizens, whether or not they are Jews.
鈥淎nything that upsets that balance, in either direction, is a threat to Israel.鈥�
