Gridlock slows Congress, but in their own work, everyday citizens have to keep solving problems or face the consequences. We asked for their practical advice for the new Congress.
Monitor readers often ask, 鈥淲here do you get your story ideas?鈥 The answer in this case: a rustic stone cottage with no internet.聽
While on vacation, my husband and I were reading Capt. C.B. 鈥淪ully鈥 Sullenberger鈥檚 book about his 2009 forced landing on the Hudson River 鈥 and the lifetime of preparation that enabled him to save all 155 people aboard.聽
After a bird strike incapacitated his plane at low altitude, he showed extraordinary problem-solving, decisiveness, and disciplined focus. Those qualities struck me as ones that could help break gridlock in Congress. And I began thinking: Who else from the civilian world could provide leadership advice forged in crisis?
I recalled Pete Kristiansen, who had helped us with some urgent bathroom repairs when we first moved to Washington, D.C., saying that it鈥檚 not the people in suits who hold the power in Washington 鈥撀爄t鈥檚 the plumbers. (Indeed, there鈥檚 nothing like a plumbing emergency to give new meaning to 鈥渓evers of power.鈥) And I remembered Antoinette Tuff, who thwarted a 2013 school shooting through her faith and love for the troubled young gunman.聽
Congress may see itself as a body of gifted elites who don鈥檛 need advice from plumbers or folks outside the Beltway. But America was founded on the idea that 鈥淲e the people鈥 are sovereign. That gives a certain credibility to this 鈥淲e the problem-solvers鈥 approach to an institution in crisis 鈥 one many see as out of touch with the people it was designed to serve.
Not all ideas hatched by a wood stove come to fruition, of course. Special gratitude goes to our late colleague Dave Scott, who encouraged me to pursue this out-of-the-box idea. Thanks to our willing sources and Clara Germani, my dedicated editor, here it is, ready for you to unwrap. May 2023 bring more problem-solving, in Congress and beyond.