Women strength coaches do the heavy lifting for women鈥檚 athletics
A in mid-March by Stanford University performance coach Ali Kershner quickly became national news. One side-by-side photo showing a well-stocked men鈥檚 training facility and a grossly underequipped women鈥檚 facility made plain the gross inequalities in the most high-profile college sporting event, the NCAA basketball championships.
鈥淭hat weekend the story broke,鈥� says Jeanne Rankin, director of strength and conditioning at Eastern Connecticut State University, 鈥淚 was on my phone pushing stuff out [in response], and I was just exhausted. There鈥檚 just constant disrespect toward women鈥檚 sports.鈥�
Corliss Fingers, director of strength and conditioning at Bethune-Cookman University, understands the frustration but has a more optimistic view. 鈥淚 think this is going to be a watershed moment,鈥� she says. These inequalities have 鈥渁lways been there, but every opportunity creates new conversations.鈥�
Why We Wrote This
As female strength coaches command more respect and 鈥� slowly 鈥� better positions, they鈥檙e raising their voices on behalf of women鈥檚 collegiate athletics, an important step on the path toward parity with men鈥檚 teams.
Increasingly these conversations are being led by female strength coaches like Ms. Fingers and Ms. Rankin. While largely unknown to sports fans, strength coaches are well known to those in a position to shine a brighter light on women鈥檚 athletics: male strength and conditioning coaches, athletic administrators, and college athletes.
The impact they鈥檙e having is both changing the perception of women鈥檚 college athletics and creating opportunities in top-level jobs that could affect the way we view women鈥檚 college sports.
鈥淚t鈥檚 an evolution鈥�
Ms. Fingers has been breaking barriers throughout her career. Following a successful 15-year stint at the University of Maryland, Southern University hired her in 2012 as the first female head strength and conditioning coach for a Division I football program. Today she鈥檚 head strength coach at Bethune-Cookman University and recognized nationally by her peers as a role model for the next generation of strength coaches.
鈥淲hen I started,鈥� she says, 鈥淚 was on an island by myself. I was a unicorn, and a lot of guys couldn鈥檛 handle it.鈥� She was also hesitant to speak out because she was both the only woman and the only Black person on staff.
The NCAA Demographics Database bears that out. In 2012, there were 240 women with the title strength coach across Division I, II, and III schools. By 2020 that number had only grown to 397 across roughly 1,100 schools.
鈥淭hese are strong people,鈥� says Brian Gearity, director of the sport coaching master鈥檚 degree program at the University of Denver. 鈥淭hese women 鈥� are totally cognitively loaded, in ways that most strength coaches never have been.鈥�
鈥淚t鈥檚 an evolution,鈥� says Sandy Abney, chief science officer at the Collegiate Strength and Conditioning Coaches Association (CSCCa) and a former strength coach at the University of Texas.
That evolution has been apparent at the annual CSCCa women鈥檚 breakfast meeting. Ms. Fingers remembers when she first started attending in the mid-2000s.
鈥淭here were 10 of us,鈥� she recalls. 鈥淣ow, we鈥檙e well over a 100.鈥�
Still, no one is Pollyannaish about the work that lies ahead. 鈥淲e face lots of challenges,鈥� says Sara Terrell, chair of the National Strength and Conditioning Association鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Committee and an associate professor of exercise science at Florida Southern College. 鈥淲omen in [strength] roles have no room for error. They feel they must do more, work harder, and do better.鈥� And while there are more jobs, she adds that many still go to men.
That鈥檚 also borne out by the NCAA Demographics Database. Women are being hired as strength coaches, but the percentages are stagnant. In 2012, some 14% of college strength coaches were women. In 2020, it鈥檚 still 14%. Between those years, the percentage was never higher than 15.
鈥淲e are going somewhere,鈥� says Dr. Gearity, 鈥渂ut slower than it needs to be.鈥� Though he admits the women鈥檚 basketball fiasco has called attention to the challenges facing women鈥檚 athletics and strength coaches, he worries about the staying power. 鈥淧eople will weather this social media storm,鈥� he says, noting that more fundamental changes need to occur. 鈥淏udgets need to change, policies need to change.鈥�
As important, he says, men need to change. 鈥淭he issue has got to be for men to become more critical and aware of themselves,鈥� he says. Men must be 鈥渃ommitted to making organizations diverse and equitable.鈥�
Beyond communication to connection
A couple hundred men had their eyes opened last spring after Ms. Fingers joined a Zoom call hosted by the African American Performance Coaches Association and its founder, SaJason Finley. It was meant to be a time to unite strength coaches as the pandemic was closing the country down. Ms. Fingers, however, felt left out. 鈥淲e did a little closing prayer,鈥� she says. 鈥淚t was 鈥榤en this,鈥� and 鈥榤en that.鈥欌��
The email Mr. Finley got from her after the meeting changed his perspective, he says. The two talked the following week. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e going through twice as much as we go through,鈥� Mr. Finley says. 鈥淲e then brought those lessons before a couple hundred performance coaches. We just didn鈥檛 know the challenges these women were facing. She鈥檚 Mama Fingers to me now. [I鈥檓] excited about how we鈥檙e moving forward.鈥澛�
Ms. Rankin, from Eastern Connecticut State University, appreciates the positive momentum, too. However, 鈥渨e need more women in charge of Tier I men鈥檚 sports,鈥� she says. And we need 鈥渕ore women who are directors.鈥� Currently she counts only about 30 female directors of strength and conditioning in Division I.
Institutional change is happening, though, and Arizona State University (ASU) is one of those leading the way.
Liane Blyn, a championship weightlifter, is director of sports performance and Olympic sports at ASU. Forty percent of her staff is female, something she credits the university for. 鈥淲e have a great athletic director,鈥� she says. 鈥淲e have people who look at the future and want to lead.鈥�
Bringing women on board has distinctive advantages, too, since a significant percentage of college athletes come from single-parent households.
鈥淭he majority of my players,鈥� says Ms. Fingers, 鈥渨ere raised by a strong, Black female. 鈥� They get that I鈥檓 coming at them from a place of concern.鈥澛�
Ms. Blyn agrees. 鈥淎 lot of it comes down to ego,鈥� she says. 鈥淎thletes are willing to trust a female when ego doesn鈥檛 get in the way. When you take interest in the athlete as a person and build that connection, that trumps communication. Connection is what I want for you,鈥� she says. And that鈥檚 what many female trainers bring. Men tend to stress communication, and that, she explains, is about 鈥渨hat I want from 测辞耻.鈥�
Women鈥檚 collegiate athletics still have a long way to go before they鈥檙e accepted by the general public as on par with men鈥檚 athletics. Female athletic trainers, however, are playing a significant role in that transition.
For Ms. Fingers, it all comes back to having a voice. 鈥淚f I don鈥檛 agree with something, I use my voice. The more we empower these younger women to use their voices, the more they will be listened to.鈥�
This past March, the NCAA heard one of those voices loud and clear. This time, she wasn鈥檛 on an island as Ms. Fingers was 25 years ago. She had a growing force of female strength trainers behind her.
