Bill Clinton speech: Has he become Obama's defender-in-chief?
| CHARLOTTE, N.C.
Has Bill Clinton become President Obama鈥檚 defender-in-chief? It sure seems like it following the rousing and partisan Wednesday night address to the Democratic National Convention. If there was a bottom line to speech reaction, it was this: Nobody but the Big Dog could have clearly laid out such a detailed (and lengthy) case for Obama鈥檚 reelection. That was a point on which Democrats and many Republicans agreed.
鈥淐linton made a stronger case for the president鈥檚 reelection than either Obama or his campaign have been able to muster,鈥� in the conservative Weekly Standard on Thursday. (Not that Mr. Barnes agreed with many of Clinton鈥檚 points 鈥� more on that in a bit.)
From the moment he sauntered on stage to his signature Fleetwood Mac song, 鈥淒on鈥檛 Stop Thinking About Tomorrow," Clinton looked like a speaker delighted to have returned to the high reaches of the political game. As Jonathan Bernstein notes on his , the ex-president appeared energized by more than just the adulation of the crowd 鈥� though he loved that, too. Clinton seems to just love every aspect of the politician鈥檚 profession, including talking about policy.
鈥淲hat he鈥檚 brilliant at doing is transforming [wonkish details] into something that can impress average voters by sounding like it鈥檚 extremely substantive while at the same time impressing policy folks by actually being extremely substantive, and (usually, and as far as I could hear tonight) factually honest,鈥� .
For instance, Clinton laid the foundation for his defense of Obama鈥檚 economic record by citing facts and figures about the rate of job losses at the very end of George W. Bush鈥檚 term. He contrasted those with the slowly accumulating job gains under Obama, admitted that wasn鈥檛 enough, and tied the whole thing to the administration鈥檚 attempts to jump-start investment in solar energy and other developing technologies.
鈥淗e inherited a deeply damaged economy, put a floor under the crash, began the long hard road to recovery, and laid the foundation for a more modern, more well-balanced economy that will produce millions of good new jobs,鈥� said Clinton. 鈥淐onditions are improving and if you鈥檒l renew the president鈥檚 contract, you will feel it.鈥�
The last president to preside over sustained economy growth also summed up the Democratic attempt to blame things on Bush, though he didn鈥檛 invoke Bush鈥檚 name directly.
鈥淚n Tampa, the Republican argument against the president鈥檚 reelection was pretty simple: We left him a total mess, he hasn鈥檛 finished cleaning it up yet, so fire him and put us back in.鈥�
Then he turned to a sustained attack on the GOP, of the I鈥檓-doing-this-more-in-sadness-than-in-anger variety. He tried to make a case that Obama has been willing to compromise and work across the aisle, in the process using the fact of his wife Hillary鈥檚 appointment as Secretary of State as evidence that the incumbent is willing to work with his political foes. Of course she鈥檚 a Democrat, but you鈥檇 hardly have noticed that if you were caught up in the rhythm of Clinton鈥檚 argument.
He defined the GOP as a party controlled by its right wing and driven, not just by opposition to Obama, but by hatred.
鈥淒emocracy does not have to be a blood sport,鈥� he said, to audience cheers.
And then the policy wonk appeared, and Clinton went point by point through the GOP鈥檚 arguments against Obama. On Medicare, he noted the VP nominee Paul Ryan鈥檚 budget contained the same reductions in expenditures as Obama pushed through with the Affordable Care Act. Congressman Ryan and nominee Mitt Romney now decry those reductions as dangerous to the program.
鈥淚t takes some brass to attack a guy for doing what you did,鈥� said Clinton.
On Romney/Ryan鈥檚 budget plan, Clinton noted that they propose tax cuts as well as reductions. In essence, according to the ex-president, the Republicans are saying we need to climb out of our debt hole by first digging it deeper. On welfare, he decried GOP attack ads that assert Obama is gutting work requirements. Independent fact-checkers have widely judged those ads inaccurate.
鈥淭heir campaign pollster said, 鈥榃e are not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers.' Now finally I can say: That is true,鈥� said Clinton, to laughter from the crowd.
But in defending Obama鈥檚 record, Clinton implicitly abandoned his own, judged conservative Barnes. When he was in office, Clinton famously once said 鈥渢he era of big government is over." But now he鈥檚 defending what the Weekly Standard writer calls Obama鈥檚 鈥渉yper-liberalism."
鈥淥n top of that, the Clinton wing of the Democratic party 鈥� that is, pro-business moderates and conservatives 鈥� has all but vanished since Obama became president,鈥� Barnes wrote.
Plus, Clinton鈥檚 speech was just long, and somewhat self-indulgent, said GOP critics.
鈥淭he speech went on and on and on, likely sending all but the fawning media off to bed,鈥� on her Washington Post Right Turn blog.
And Clinton may have led his party into a political trap. At one point, he asked the crowd if they thought they were better off than four years ago, and they responded with an overwhelming shout of 鈥淵es!鈥�
That鈥檚 a clip that could show up in Republican ads that attempt to portray the Obama administration and its defenders as out of touch with the US.
鈥淚n fact, most voters think they are worse off than four years ago,鈥� .
