'Obamagate' danger for the GOP: political overreach
Benghazi terrorist attack ... IRS and the tea party ... snooping on Associated Press reporters ... losing track of terrorists in the witness protection program.
What the heck, let鈥檚 just call the whole thing 鈥淥bamagate,鈥� a cluster of what Washington calls 鈥渟candals鈥� threatening to undermine whatever President Obama hoped to achieve in his second term.
鈥淚mpeachment鈥� is being flung around by some opponents as congressional committee chairmen in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives line up to fire rhetorically at administration officials.
But there鈥檚 a danger for the GOP too, some Republicans warn 鈥� particularly since Congress already labors under a 79 percent disapproval rate, according to the latest Gallup survey.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich concedes that Republicans 鈥渙verreached鈥� in 1998 when they pushed for then-President Bill Clinton鈥檚 impeachment in the Monica Lewinsky 补蹿蹿补颈谤.听
Today, Gingrich told NPR Friday, House Republicans leading the investigative parade 鈥渘eed to be calm and factual,鈥� proceeding with caution as they sniff out any administration wrongdoing.
"For example,鈥� he said, 鈥渁 [House] subcommittee ... should invite every single tea party, conservative, patriot group that was messed over by the IRS 鈥� every single one of them 鈥� to come in and testify, so that they build this deadening record of how many different people were having their rights abused by this administration.鈥�
New York Times writer Jonathan Weisman echoes Gingrich鈥檚 point: 鈥淭he most pressing question for Congressional Republicans is no longer how to finesse changes to immigration law or gun control, but how far they can push their cases against President Obama without inciting a backlash of the sort that has left them staggering in the past.鈥�
鈥淚鈥檓 being very cautious not to overplay my hand,鈥� US Rep. Charles Boustany Jr., (R) of Louisiana, who sits on the Ways and Means Committee investigating the IRS, told the Times.
An editorial this week in the conservative National Review picks up the same theme. Its headline: 鈥淪candal Is Not an Agenda.鈥�
鈥淒emocratic scandal does not take the place of a Republican agenda,鈥� the magazine鈥檚 editors write. 鈥淚t does not reform the tax code or reduce the debt or ease regulatory burdens on small business. It cannot substitute for a strategy to replace Obamacare.鈥�
鈥淏y all means, Republicans should run against the president and his party,鈥� the editorial continues. 鈥淭hey should at the same time understand that a purely negative message, however justified, will not produce the governing majority Republicans should be aiming for in the next two elections.鈥�
Mike Allen and Jim Vanderhei at Politico.com put it more colorfully: 鈥淩epublicans are worried one thing could screw up the political gift of three Obama administration controversies at once: fellow Republicans.
鈥淭op GOP leaders are privately warning members to put a sock in it when it comes to silly calls for impeachment or over-the-top comparisons to Watergate,鈥� they write. 鈥淭hey want members to focus on months of fact-finding investigations 鈥� not rhetorical fury.鈥�
Some of the most furious Republicans: Rep. Michele Bachmann asserting that the IRS probe of tea partiers 鈥渋s far worse than Watergate;鈥� Sen. James Inhofe suggesting Obama鈥檚 impeachment; Sen. Ted Cruz likening Obama to Richard Nixon; former Arkansas governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee predicting darkly that 鈥渂efore it鈥檚 all over, this president will not fill out his full term.鈥�
鈥淲e have to be persistent but patient,鈥� counters Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who told Politico, 鈥淵ou don鈥檛 call for impeachment until you have evidence.鈥�
Amitai Etzioni, professor of international relations at George Washington University, wonders about the longer-term impact of scandal mania.
鈥淭here is little doubt about the side effects of hearings, investigations, and media hoopla to follow: they will eat up much of whatever little political capital exists in Washington for bipartisan deals and constructive action,鈥� he writes in The Atlantic. 鈥淎nd they are sure to further delegitimize our political institutions, which the public already holds in unprecedented contempt.鈥�
Obama鈥檚 current troubles may include some genuinely scandalous behavior. But if Republicans are perceived as bogging down legitimate government activity for political gain, they may be scarred as well.
