海角大神

Last Friday, when the writer and advice columnist E. Jean Carroll accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan 23 years ago, few of the nation鈥檚 major media outlets treated it as bombshell news.

Just a few days later, however, many journalists and critics have begun to wonder why. The president immediately denied what would聽 have been an explosive, news-dominating allegation, and he quickly attacked the well-known author鈥檚 credibility, suggesting her possible ulterior motives.

Ms. Carroll leveled her accusations, after all, in , and published Friday in New York Magazine 鈥� a little more than a week before her book鈥檚 scheduled release. 鈥淪hame on those who make up false stories of assault to get publicity for themselves, or sell a book, or carry out a political agenda,鈥� President Trump said.聽

The columnist鈥檚 accusation and the president鈥檚 denial were all but absent in this weekend鈥檚 headlines and Sunday morning roundtables, and decried the fact that this latest allegation .

Yet when it comes to discerning the credibility of those who allege sexual assault, many media ethicists and journalists say, it is actually essential that news outlets react in a sober-minded聽and particularly careful way.聽聽

鈥淚 do think that in the MeToo era, news outlets have had to be extremely cautious and extremely meticulous about what they publish,鈥� says Lauren Wright, lecturer in politics and public affairs at Princeton University in New Jersey, and a frequent political analyst on Fox News, CNN, and other news outlets. 鈥淭hey do check it out, they do figure it out, and they do have that due diligence process, and that sometimes takes a few days.鈥�

The reporting of The New York Times and other outlets, in fact, helped give voice to the many women who were sexually harassed and assaulted by Hollywood moguls like Harvey Weinstein as well as Fox News titans Bill O鈥橰eilly and Roger Ailes.

Still, critics singled out the particular dearth of coverage in this weekend鈥檚 editions of the Times, which for its investigations of what became the #MeToo movement. On Monday, the publication鈥檚 executive editor, Dean Baquet, admitted that in their handling of Ms. Carroll鈥檚 allegations against the president.聽

But Mr. Baquet also provided insight into the guidelines the paper employs when trying to assess the credibility of an accuser. These include locating sources other than those mentioned by the accusers who are willing to corroborate their allegations on the record. In this story, Mr. Baquet said, The Times could not find any independent sources beyond the two friends Ms. Carroll cited in her book, or any other additional corroborating evidence.聽

Nevertheless, given that a respected public figure like Ms. Carroll, whose advice column 鈥淎sk E. Jean鈥� has appeared in Elle magazine since 1993, was making a public allegation against a sitting president 鈥渟hould鈥檝e compelled us to play it bigger,鈥� he said.

鈥淏ut the history of coverage of sexual assault in America鈥檚 media has always been one of extreme caution, and that is driven by a sense of fairness,鈥� says Ken Paulson, former editor-in-chief of USA TODAY and now the director of the Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University in Murfreesboro. 鈥淚t鈥檚 an allegation that, once unveiled, never gets put away.鈥�

And all things being equal, Mr. Paulson suggests, President Trump鈥檚 questions about the credibility of his accuser and her possible motives are usually valid concerns.聽

鈥淚f you take the same fact situation, and someone in your community accuses a small-town mayor of rape from 23 years earlier, and there鈥檚 no other indications of such behavior,鈥� he says, 鈥測ou would look at that with considerable caution. You would ask understandable questions: Why is the allegation being made today?鈥澛�

But as he and other observers point out, all things are far from equal when it comes to President Trump. Ms. Carroll is on the record of sexual assault or misconduct, and hers is in many ways the most serious, as she alleges an attack that included forced penetration.聽

Add to these accusations, too, the fact that the president described sexually assaulting women in the infamous Access Hollywood video and audiotapes.

鈥淭he credibility regarding charges of sexual assault should be the same as in any other matter: What are the facts, and who and how many people can testify to those facts?鈥� says Paul Levinson, professor of media studies at Fordham University in New York. 鈥淧eople should make decisions about whom to believe with the utmost gravity. The credibility of the accused and the accuser should both be taken into account.鈥�

Even though Dr. Wright at Princeton University agrees that the news media has generally handled the recent allegations of rape against the president in an even-handed and proper way, she points out that it is far more complicated when it comes to assessing the credibility of women accusing powerful men of sexual assault.聽

鈥淭he first thing we always do is question their credibility and ask questions about them,鈥� she says. 鈥淎nd their claims are always scrutinized ad nauseam.鈥�

鈥淎nd the baseline, I would say, is not that we believe women, the baseline is that we do not believe women,鈥� continues Dr. Wright, author of 鈥淪tar Power: American Democracy in the Age of the Celebrity Candidate.鈥� 鈥淎nd that has been the case going back to the beginning of time, as long as humans have existed 鈥� women have not been believed.鈥�

False accusations are rare when it comes to sexual assault, according to an in-depth survey of existing research on the subject by the , a nonprofit in Pennsylvania. Only 2% to 7% of accusations in various parts of the counter were found to be fabricated or false.

鈥淣obody wants to become famous from their story of sexual assault,鈥� Dr. Wright says. 鈥淚 mean, this idea has been proven again and again, that women face many more consequences when they come out with their story, and the rewards, really, are nonexistent. Society actually punishes you.鈥澛犅�

Some observers also saw an 鈥渙utrage fatigue鈥� at work in the news media鈥檚 cautious response to Ms. Carroll鈥檚 accusations, especially on the heels of the divisive confirmation hearings of Justice Brett Kavanaugh last year.聽 Others pointed out, too, that the most recent allegations against President Trump were part of a busy weekend in the news, including the humanitarian crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border and the administration鈥檚 mulling military action against Iran.

鈥淏ut there is a dynamic to President Trump that we have never seen before,鈥� says Mr. Paulson, the former editor-in-chief of USA TODAY. 鈥淗e does things, he says things, and he is accused of things that would have destroyed less confident candidates or public officials. And that, in some way, can affect editors who sort of go, here we go again.鈥�

鈥淏ut I guess the long and short of it is that I think that the press overall has acted responsibly, even though there are factors in this case that would lead you not to strip it across the top of your front page in a headline,鈥� he continues. 鈥淭hese should give anyone caution, but it also doesn鈥檛 mean you shouldn鈥檛 cover the accusations, and that you should actually dig deeper.鈥�