海角大神

In a historic move Monday, California became the first state to require that its farm workers receive overtime pay for working more than 40 hours a week.聽

Supporters of the new law, signed by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) Monday, heralded it as the culmination of a nearly 80-year effort to give farm workers the same wage rights as almost every other hourly worker in the country. Since Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, agricultural laborers have been exempt from overtime laws.

While three states 鈥� Hawaii, Maryland, and Minnesota 鈥� require some forms of overtime pay for agricultural laborers, California is the first to lower the threshold to eight hours a day or 40 hours a week.

Critics call the law misguided, saying it will force some growers to move out of state and others to cut workers鈥� hours.

But the move fits into a broader trend of Democratic-led states pushing up wages for the poorest Americans amid concerns that income inequality has worsened. The 鈥淔ight for 15鈥� movement has seen 26 states and the District of Columbia increase their minimum wage since January 2014, .

鈥淚 wouldn鈥檛 be surprised if the struggle for increases in minimum wage around the country also makes this a little bit more palatable,鈥� says Angela Cornell, director of the Labor Law Clinic at Cornell Law School in Ithaca, N.Y. 鈥淭here is really an understanding and appreciation for the fact that it鈥檚 very, very challenging for workers to get by with pay that is so low.鈥�

Expanding that movement to the agricultural sector marks a milestone, some say.

鈥淐onditions have gotten increasingly bad [for farm workers] in a lot of respects,鈥� says Devra Weber, an associate professor of history at the University of California, Riverside. 鈥淭his really is a historic marker in an attempt to improve conditions for farm workers in a time that鈥檚 very rough for workers as a whole.鈥�

The new law is expected to impact more than 825,000 laborers in America鈥檚 largest farming state. California鈥檚 agricultural industry was valued at $54 billion last year, while the state鈥檚 farm workers made an average of less than $16,000 a year, , a Palm Springs, Calif., newspaper.

More overtime ... less money?

Yet farmers and Republican lawmakers argue that the law is not in the workers鈥� best interests.聽

鈥淭his bill means they will get less hours, that they will have less money in their pockets,鈥� said Assemblyman James Gallagher (R), arguing against the bill last month, .

The new rules will be phased in over a four-year period beginning in 2019. Given how dramatically food prices fluctuate from year to year, farmers say they try to keep operating costs as low as possible. Keeping workers on the same schedule and paying more for overtime isn鈥檛 an option for many.

Another provision of the law 鈥� mandating a maximum six-day work week 鈥� also cuts into seasonal workers鈥� pocketbooks, says Joe Del Bosque, owner of Del Bosque Farms on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley.

鈥淢y employees, they鈥檙e not going to be happy with that,鈥� he says. 鈥淲hat I hear from them all the time is they want to work as many hours as they can because it鈥檚 a short season and the rest of the year they鈥檙e not working as much.鈥�

At his farm, seasonal workers have been working seven days a week since the end of June. Requiring them to take a day off would reduce their weekly take by more than $100, he says.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 the irony in this thing,鈥� he continues. The law 鈥渋s going to make people lose money because it鈥檚 the right and moral thing to do.鈥�

The longer-term impact will be a loss of market share to other regions with less generous, or nonexistent, wage laws, says Jack Vessey, president of Vessey and Company, a farm in the Imperial Valley just a few miles from Mexico and Arizona.

鈥淢y direct competition is 40 miles away, [and] their laws are a 鈥� lot different than my laws,鈥� he says. 鈥淚 guarantee there鈥檚 going to be more product going to Mexico and Arizona.鈥�

Righting historic wrongs

Some experts question whether the law will have such an onerous effect on California farmers, however. The state is in the midst of , says J. Edward Taylor, director of the Center on Rural Economics of the Americas and the Pacific Rim. So wages were likely to increase for farm workers anyway, he argues.

鈥淔rom a social justice point of view, it鈥檚 a very significant piece of legislation,鈥� he says. But 鈥渋n this kind of environment, a regulation like this is less significant than it would be in a labor-abundant environment.鈥�

To proponents of the law, it rights a series of wrongs dating back to before World War II.

鈥淭o work 10 hours a day, six days a week is not physically possible. This gives them the opportunity to not have to work so much,鈥� says Arturo Rodriguez, president of United Farm Workers of America, which sponsored the bill. 鈥淏ut if they do, fine. At least they will be compensated,鈥�

These days, he continues, 鈥減eople are much more conscious about the sacrifices that farm workers make.鈥�