Was the United States鈥 abrupt final departure from Afghanistan a strategic necessity or a slap in the face? We consider how it looks to the U.S. military, to Afghans, and to the global community.
Haiti and Afghanistan. If you wanted to pick two places on earth that convey chronic hopelessness and dysfunction, you鈥檇 be hard-pressed to find better examples. Yet here we are, with articles about them in today鈥檚 issue.
Most often, these聽countries聽are ignored, cast in terminal woe, or looked at through the distant lens of geopolitics. In short, they easily recede from our attention. That鈥檚 understandable.聽For most of us,聽their stories will not affect聽our聽morning commute. By most definitions of 鈥渞elevance,鈥 they are not聽high on our list.
But the Monitor has a different view. Our common humanity is relevant. Progress for every corner of the world is relevant. The values we share and hope to uphold are relevant. Not just for historians or foreign-policy buffs. For everyone. Our global story teaches us, deepens us, enriches us.
What does the manner of the United States鈥 departure from Afghanistan say about its sense of responsibility? We examine three key perspectives. And must we view the assassination of Haiti鈥檚 president as another chapter in a story of unrelenting despair? There are seeds of hope buried deep, says writer Kathie Klarreich. Can they flourish? That is relevant to all of us.
鈥淲hen I heard about the assassination, I had a list of people I wanted to call to see how they were doing, but I didn鈥檛 because I knew they鈥檇 be busy figuring out next steps about how to make their country better,鈥 Kathie tells me. 鈥淓veryone in their own way is trying to figure this out, and because they haven鈥檛 lost hope, I haven鈥檛 lost hope.鈥