President Joe Biden says he wants to buttress democracies worldwide. Last weekend鈥檚 coup in Myanmar offers a lesson: The way forward is long, hard, and not without setbacks.
Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The First Church of Christ, Scientist, and we鈥檝e always been transparent about that.
The church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we鈥檝e aimed 鈥渢o injure no man, but to bless all mankind,鈥 as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.
Here, you鈥檒l find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences 鈥 a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
About usAlready a subscriber? Log in
Already have a subscription? Activate it
Join the Monitor community.
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
What are the limits of empathy? In today鈥檚 society, we often think about the good empathy does. It can expand our sense of compassion and encourage us to see the wholeness of the world, as well as our place in it.
But empathy can have another side. What if we are empathetic mostly to people who look like us, live near us, or talk like us? What is the morality of empathy?聽
Two researchers from the State University of New York (SUNY) in Albany wanted to delve into that question. So what you might call a 鈥済ood Samaritan鈥 experiment in which participants were asked to judge what was morally right 鈥 having more empathy for people struggling with hunger closer to home or in a foreign country. Then they tweaked the experiment, asking similar questions about people the participants actually knew, one a family member, the other an acquaintance.聽
In both experiments, participants said the most moral outcome was equal empathy. Other studies suggest that those who invest in becoming more empathetic see their ability to relate to and care about others grow. The SUNY researchers add, 鈥淥ur research provides evidence that this principle of equality in empathy is not some obscure ideal. Rather, it is a tenet of our moral beliefs.鈥
Already a subscriber? Log in
Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.
Our work isn't possible without your support.
And why we wrote them
( 5 min. read )
President Joe Biden says he wants to buttress democracies worldwide. Last weekend鈥檚 coup in Myanmar offers a lesson: The way forward is long, hard, and not without setbacks.
( 5 min. read )
The Capitol Hill riot exposed deep fissures in American politics. But it also exposed the opposite 鈥 the importance of leadership based on humility and a deep sense of service.
( 7 min. read )
Current and former military who stormed the Capitol need to be held accountable, like everyone else. But if injuries and attitudes related to their service played a role, does that matter?
( 6 min. read )
City and state officials have faced tough decisions to pass balanced budgets. The result has been longer unemployment lines, reduced services 鈥 and a search for what else could be done.
( 4 min. read )
With Lunar New Year approaching, we look behind the iconic lion masks to see how a master of the craft creates his living works of art. The goal is a harmony of dance, music, and expression.
( 2 min. read )
When Britain鈥檚 regulators recently looked at whether the four largest audit firms help companies factor in the risk of climate change on financial outlooks, they found none did so. It was another example of contemporary economic thinking not accounting for nature. Now a report commissioned by the U.K. Treasury hopes to change that approach to business.
The 600-page report, prepared by a team of economists and released Feb. 1, says the worth of nature鈥檚 goods and services should be prioritized over traditional measures of economic activity such as gross domestic product. Companies and governments should account for the benefits of investing in the preservation of natural assets such as plants, wildlife, air, water, and soil.
鈥淣ature is our home. Good economics demands we manage it better,鈥 said Sir聽Partha Dasgupta,聽a professor emeritus at the University of Cambridge who oversaw the two-year collaboration of academics.
The report found that countries currently spend $4 trillion to $6 trillion a year on subsidies that damage nature, often unaware of the long-term loss of natural assets. It found that the global capital produced per person had doubled in the past three decades while the stock of natural capital, or services provided by nature to each individual, has dropped by 40%. 聽In other words, people are becoming more productive only by significantly depleting our environment.聽聽
Companies and countries must shift their financial decision-making toward preservation. The report recommends, for example, that countries be paid to save forests and oceans. Companies that overfish in nonterritorial oceans should be charged for their exploitation.
What is just as important as the report鈥檚 findings is that it came from Britain鈥檚 economic leaders, not its environmental agencies. Its conclusions will be presented at the next United Nations summit on biodiversity, known as COP 15, in May. The summit is expected to finalize international targets for addressing biodiversity loss. The United Kingdom is also this year鈥檚 head of the Group of Seven leading economies and will host the next U.N. Climate Change Conference.
The report builds on a massive U.N. study in 2019 that looked at ways to regain an equilibrium between humans and nature. It recommended that 鈥渧isions of a good life鈥 should no longer 鈥渆ntail ever-increasing material consumption.鈥 Progress, it found, must be redefined from 鈥渢he current limited paradigm鈥 of economic output.
Trying to measure nature鈥檚 capital 鈥渋s not about putting a price tag on every bee and tree,鈥 says Inger Andersen, head of the U.N. Environment Program. 鈥淚t is about understanding that intact ecosystems are ultimately worth more to humanity than when they are destroyed.鈥 Nature, in other words, has its own intrinsic worth. Its depletion is forcing humans to recalculate the nature of our own worth.
Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication 鈥 in its various forms 鈥 is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church 鈥 The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston 鈥 whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.
( 1 min. read )
Meekness may seem an unlikely quality to value. But as this poem conveys, humbly turning to God, infinite good, to impel what we say and do is actually a source of strength and progress.
Thank you for joining us today. Please keep an eye out this week for Whitney Eulich鈥檚 epic story of a Honduran boy who was separated from his father at the United States border, and how they have since been reunited.