'The Cloister' probes deeply into matters of faith, dogma, complicity, and forgiveness
Loading...
With The Cloister, James Carroll manages a balancing act that would have thwarted lesser novelists. He juggles three stories, from different eras, that each probe deeply into matters of faith, dogma, complicity, and forgiveness. The book, as its title suggests, has a great deal of religion at its center, specifically Roman Catholicism. It's a tradition that Carroll knows well, both as a historian and a former priest.聽
Readers familiar with his previous work, especially the 2001 nonfiction book, 鈥淐onstantine鈥檚 Sword: The Church and the Jews,鈥 will recognize at least one of Carroll鈥檚 preoccupations in this novel: the idea that 20th-century anti-Semitism had its roots in the Catholic Church鈥檚 centuries-old assertion that the Jews were to blame for the death of Jesus Christ.
The book鈥檚 two main characters are Michael Kavanagh, a priest, and Rachel Vedette, a Jewish Holocaust survivor, who meet in the unlikely setting of The Cloisters in New York in the 1950s. The Cloisters is the Metropolitan Museum of Art鈥檚 outpost of medieval art atop Fort Tryon Park, overlooking the Hudson River. As the two protagonists become acquainted, the reader begins to understand that their present lives are deeply affected by their perceptions of past mistakes.聽
We learn about Rachel largely through flashbacks to her life in Nazi-occupied Paris, when she helped her father research an important book on the 12th-century 海角大神 philosopher Peter Abelard. The monk, whose name has been linked with that of his paramour, H茅lo茂se, was an early supporter of Jews in France. The church condemned Abelard as a heretic, effectively silencing his campaign to change church attitudes about the Jews.
Rachel and her father believe that Abelard鈥檚 writings point to a fork in the road for 海角大神ity. The story 鈥渃ould have gone another way, and the pivot point, ages ago, was the place of the Jews.鈥 By publicly identifying France鈥檚 legendary monk-hero with tolerance toward the Jews, they hope to change the minds of their fellow citizens, whose fear of the Nazi occupiers and hatred of the Jews (fueled by centuries of church-sanctioned vilification) is leading them to betray their Jewish neighbors.
As a counterpoint to Kavanagh鈥檚 and Rachel鈥檚 stories, the book also weaves the tale of H茅lo茂se and Abelard, 鈥渢he Romeo and Juliet, Tristan and Isolde, Lancelot and Guinevere of la France.鈥 Their devotion to each other, body and soul, showed through their letters when they were forced to live apart (he was banished to a remote monastery, she was sent to a convent). Readers looking for salacious details about their relationship will be disappointed, because author Carroll is more interested in minds than in bodies. In particular, he gives H茅lo茂se the role of Abelard鈥檚 champion: She鈥檚 the one who preserves Abelard鈥檚 writings for a future age, hiding his manuscripts in the cloister garden. It鈥檚 a nice touch, to point out that this powerful noblewoman was the first person to recognize the future implications of Abelard鈥檚 teaching, not just as it related to the Jews, but also as it regarded the nature of God鈥檚 universal love.聽
This is heady stuff for a novel. Carroll, as religious historian and church insider, goes into a fair amount of ecclesiastical detail about the 12th century, which will fascinate some readers and send others skimming to the end of the chapter. But he keeps the action moving along, particularly in the Paris scenes as Rachel鈥檚 story plays out against the backdrop of French collusion with the Germans.
Carroll is at his best in the last few chapters, when he explores each of his characters鈥 feelings of culpability for the tragedies that they knowingly, and unknowingly, set in motion. For H茅lo茂se, Rachel, and Kavanagh, the challenge is how to move forward, fully conscious of the hurts they鈥檝e inflicted, but not seeking a facile or temporary forgiveness. Here in the braiding together of the three stories, past and present, Carroll shows that for his characters, and indeed for all of us, the greatest wisdom may lie in forgiving oneself.