Write a new constitution? After year of protest, Chileans vote.
Demonstrators hold bicycles in front of a riot police vehicle during a protest against Chile鈥檚 government, in Santiago, Chile, Sept. 25, 2020.
Ivan Alvarado/Reuters
Mexico City
Chileans are set to vote Oct. 25 on whether to rewrite the nation鈥檚 constitution, which dates back to the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet. Can a new take curtail widespread protests and frustration with a government many say doesn鈥檛 give enough voice to citizens?
Why now?
In October 2019, Chile was overwhelmed by nationwide, anti-government protests, initially sparked by an increase in subway fares. But protesters鈥� frustration snowballed as other complaints emerged, including low pensions, poor public education, and subpar public health care. On Nov. 15, 2019, President Sebasti谩n Pi帽era鈥檚 conservative government came to an agreement with the opposition to explore the possibility of a new constitution.
The referendum was initially scheduled for last April, but was postponed as the new coronavirus swept the globe, leading to lockdowns and public health crises across the Americas.聽In the vote, Chileans will decide not only if the constitution will be rewritten, but also by whom: a newly elected聽Constitutional Assembly, or a commission made up of existing members of Congress. and new delegates, who would be elected next April.
Why We Wrote This
A constitution is more than the backbone of the law 鈥� it鈥檚 a national symbol. Does Chile need a new one? After months of protest, citizens are debating just how far reforms should go.
The commission would have a year to create a new document that would require two-thirds majority approval for each article. Ratification would take place through another referendum vote at some point in early 2022.
What is the vote on?
Chile鈥檚 current constitution was approved in a controversial referendum in 1980, the height of a right-wing dictatorship responsible for and defined by violence and political impunity. Those demanding a new constitution say the fact that the current document was drawn up under a dictator should nullify its legitimacy. The constitution was reformed in 1989 and 2005, but critics feel the large congressional majority needed to change laws makes it too easy for small, fringe parties to stand in the way of citizen demands. There鈥檚 more emphasis put on protecting private property and business interests than on rights like public health, education, and social security, critics say.
For those against the idea of a constitutional rewrite,聽the idea of changing a document that has delivered three decades of steady economic growth 鈥� making Chile , according to President Pi帽era 鈥� is a dangerous gamble. The peso鈥檚 in the third quarter of this year, as the referendum drew closer. Others fear the process will be too nitpicky and drawn out, creating further impetus for protesters to take to the streets while COVID-19 is still spreading.
Polls show of Chileans support a new constitution, with saying they want rights to education and health care guaranteed under law.
What鈥檚 at stake?
Trust in democracy, for one. The decision to hold a referendum on the constitution in response to public protest was a big one, particularly in a region where trust in government fell from 45% in 2010 to 22% in 2018, according to the latest results from the . Satisfaction with democracy has been on the decline in Latin America for the past decade, as violence and perceptions of corruption increase.聽The public health concerns delaying the initial vote were valid, but any further speed bumps聽could feed protesters鈥� perceptions that the government isn鈥檛 concerned with their demands.
鈥淭he stakes have gotten higher鈥� since the vote was postponed, says Christopher Sabatini, senior fellow for Latin America at Chatham House, an international affairs think tank. Citizen frustrations over the quality of public services like health care or transportation, or access to formal jobs with benefits and pensions, have only been exacerbated during the pandemic, he says.
There are also economic concerns. The length of the entire process, including the likelihood of disagreement on how best to move forward after the October vote, could lead to months of uncertainty for international investors.
Although Mr. Sabatini is skeptical a change in the constitution will deliver the structural, systemic change citizens are clamoring for, he is hopeful the nation will navigate its way through this tense moment, given its track record for stability and a culture of adhering to norms and rules. 鈥淚f any country is equipped to deal with this in a fashion that鈥檚 constructive, it鈥檚 Chile.鈥�