海角大神

Senate parliamentarian: $3.5T bill can't fund citizenship pathway

Democrats hoped to carve out a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the filibuster-protected $3.5 trillion social and environmental bill. But on Sunday, Elizabeth MacDonough, the nonpartisan Senate parliamentarian, rejected the option.

First Look

Democrats can鈥檛 use their $3.5 trillion package bolstering social and climate programs for their plan to give millions of immigrants a chance to become citizens, the Senate鈥檚 parliamentarian said, a crushing blow to what was the party鈥檚 clearest pathway in years to attaining that long-sought goal.

The decision by Elizabeth MacDonough, the Senate鈥檚 nonpartisan interpreter of its often enigmatic rules, is a damaging and disheartening setback for President Joe Biden, congressional Democrats, and their allies in the pro-immigration and progressive communities. Though they said they鈥檇 offer her fresh alternatives, Ms. MacDonough鈥檚 stance badly wounds their hopes of unilaterally enacting 鈥� over Republican opposition 鈥� changes letting several categories of immigrants gain permanent residence and possibly citizenship.

The parliamentarian opinion that emerged Sunday is crucial because it means the immigration provisions could not be included in an immense $3.5 trillion measure that鈥檚 been shielded from GOP filibusters. Left vulnerable to those bill-killing delays, which require 60 Senate votes to defuse, the immigration language has virtually no chance in the 50-50 Senate.

In a three-page memo to senators obtained by The Associated Press, Ms. MacDonough noted that under Senate rules, provisions are not allowed in such bills if their budget effect is 鈥渕erely incidental鈥� to their overall policy impact.

Citing sweeping changes that Democrats would make in immigrants鈥� lives, Ms. MacDonough, a one-time immigration attorney, said the language 鈥渋s by any standard a broad, new immigration policy.鈥�

The rejected provisions would open multiyear doorways to legal permanent residence 鈥� and perhaps citizenship 鈥� for young immigrants brought illegally to the country as children, often called 鈥淒reamers.鈥� Also included would be immigrants with Temporary Protected Status who鈥檝e fled countries stricken by natural disasters or extreme violence, essential workers, and farm workers.

Estimates vary because many people can be in more than one category, but the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says 8 million people would be helped by the Democratic effort, Ms. MacDonough said. Mr. Biden had originally proposed a broader drive that would have affected 11 million immigrants.

Democrats and their pro-immigration allies have said they will offer alternative approaches to Ms. MacDonough that would open a doorway to permanent status to at least some immigrants.

鈥淲e are deeply disappointed in this decision but the fight to provide lawful status for immigrants in budget reconciliation continues,鈥� Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a written statement. 鈥淪enate Democrats have prepared alternate proposals and will be holding additional meetings with the Senate parliamentarian in the coming days.鈥�

鈥淎 path to permanent residency and citizenship has a significant budgetary impact, great bipartisan support, and above all it is critical to America鈥檚 recovery,鈥� said Kerri Talbot, deputy director of the Immigration Hub, a group of pro-immigration strategists. She said work would continue 鈥渢o ensure that millions of undocumented immigrants can have lasting protections.鈥�

The parliamentarian鈥檚 ruling was riling progressives at a time when Democratic leaders will need virtually every vote in Congress from their party to approve a 10-year, $3.5 trillion bill that embodies Mr. Biden鈥檚 top domestic goals.

It also comes with Republicans already signaling that they will use immigration, linking it to some voters鈥� fears of crime, as a top issue in next year鈥檚 campaigns for control of the House and Senate. The issue has gained attention in a year when huge numbers of immigrants have been encountered trying to cross the Southwest border.

鈥淒emocratic leaders refused to resist their progressive base and stand up for the rule of law, even though our border has never been less secure,鈥� said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. He said putting the provisions into filibuster-protected budget measure was 鈥渋nappropriate and I鈥檓 glad it failed.鈥�

In fact, both parties have stretched the use of the special budget protections over the years. Democrats used them to enact President Barack Obama鈥檚 2010 health care law, and Republicans used them during their failed 2017 drive to repeal that statute.

鈥淚t would have led to an increased run on the border 鈥� beyond the chaos we already have there today,鈥� said the Senate Budget Committee鈥檚 top Republican, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham.

One alternative advocates have said they鈥檙e exploring would be to update a 鈥渞egistry鈥� date that allows some immigrants in the United States by that time to become permanent residents if they meet certain conditions. But it was unclear if they would pursue that option or how the parliamentarian would rule.

White House spokesperson Vedant Patel called the parliamentarian鈥檚 decision disappointing but said senators would offer new immigration ideas.

Ms. MacDonough cited a CBO estimate that Democrats鈥� proposals would increase federal deficits by $140 billion over the coming decade. That is largely because of federal benefits the immigrants would qualify for.

But that fiscal impact, wrote Ms. MacDonough, was overshadowed by improvements the Democratic effort would make for immigrants鈥� lives.

鈥淢any undocumented persons live and work in the shadows of our society out of fear of deportation,鈥� she said. Permanent legal status would grant them 鈥渇reedom to work, freedom to travel, freedom to live openly in our society in any state in the nation, and to reunite with their families and it would make them eligible, in time, to apply for citizenship 鈥� things for which there is no federal fiscal equivalent.鈥�

That, she wrote, 鈥渋s tremendous and enduring policy change that dwarfs its budgetary impact.鈥�

Democrats and a handful of GOP allies have made halting progress during the past two decades toward legislation that would help millions of immigrants gain permanent legal status in the U.S. Ultimately, they鈥檝e been thwarted each time by broad Republican opposition.

The House has approved separate bills this year achieving much of that, but the measures have gone nowhere in the Senate because of Republican filibusters.

The overall $3.5 trillion bill would boost spending for social safety net, environment, and other programs and largely finance the initiatives with tax increases on the rich and corporations.

Progressive and moderate Democrats are battling over the measure鈥檚 price tag and details. Party leaders can鈥檛 lose any Democratic votes in the 50-50 Senate and can lose no more than three in the House.

Ms. MacDonough was appointed in 2012 when Democrats controlled the chamber and is respected as an even-handed arbiter of Senate rules.

Earlier this year, one of her rulings forced Democrats to remove a minimum wage increase from a COVID-19 relief bill, killing another top progressive priority.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.聽AP Congressional Correspondent Lisa Mascaro and AP writer Alexandra Jaffe contributed to this report.