海角大神

Briefing: Trump & Russia

While it鈥檚 too soon for definitive conclusions, here's what we know so far.

A Russian state flag waves on top of a hummer and sickle at the State Duma in Moscow, Russia, on Feb. 14, 2017.

Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP

April 6, 2017

From the day he took office, President Trump has labored under a cloud called 鈥淩ussia.鈥

According to , individuals connected to Russian intelligence hacked into Democratic Party computers during the 2016 election campaign and leaked information in an effort to damage Hillary Clinton鈥檚 presidential campaign. Russian President Vladimir Putin himself ordered the operation, .

At the same time, a growing number of Trump associates have been found to have connections to Russia (see this ). So far, there's no proof of collaboration with the Russian government to help Trump win the election, but the question of whether such collaboration took place remains open. The FBI and two congressional committees are investigating.

Lesotho makes Trump鈥檚 polo shirts. He could destroy their garment industry.

Another concern is leaks to the press. Foremost is the question of who leaked the name of Michael Flynn, Trump鈥檚 now-former national security adviser, and the contents of intercepted phone calls he had with the Russian ambassador.

This week, two other names moved onto the marquee:

  • Rep. Devin Nunes (R) of California, who announced Thursday that he is temporarily stepping aside from his committee's Russia investigation while his behavior is investigated by the House ethics committee. Congressman Nunes had raised partisan hackles last month over controversial steps he took while investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election. 听
  • Susan Rice, national security adviser under President Barack Obama, who faces claims that she inappropriately used her ability to 鈥渦nmask鈥 the names of Trump associates in intelligence intercepts 鈥 an allegation she denies.

All together, these story lines can create confusion for Americans who just want the basic facts. While it鈥檚 too soon for definitive conclusions, here's what we know so far:

What was the nature of Trump associates' contact with Russians?

There are different categories of contact. One centers on communication with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak. Mr. Flynn, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner all spoke with or met Ambassador Kislyak both before and after the election.

There鈥檚 nothing wrong with talking to the Russian ambassador. The trouble for Flynn and Mr. Sessions is that they were not forthcoming about such contacts when asked. Flynn also faced questions over whether he acted illegally when against Russia with Kislyak before Trump took office. Flynn was fired; Sessions recused himself from any Justice Department investigations into Russian involvement in the election.

What the sentence in Breonna Taylor鈥檚 death says about police reform under Trump

In addition, Flynn was , including RT state-owned television, a cargo airline, and a cybersecurity firm. Flynn requested immunity from the Justice Department and the House and Senate intelligence committees in exchange for testimony, but the request has not been granted.

Mr. Kushner, too, has had other contact with high-profile Russians. In December, during the transition, he met with the chairman of a bank with ties to Putin that has been under US sanctions for three years. The meeting does not violate sanctions, but it caught .

Other Trump associates with Russia connections include Paul Manafort, Carter Page, and Roger Stone, who were involved with his campaign but are not members of his administration.

Long before serving as Trump鈥檚 campaign manager for five months last year, Mr. Manafort had worked for the Russian-backed former president of Ukraine, as well as Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs. Manafort鈥檚 work in Eastern Europe is .

Mr. Page, whose role in the campaign was less central than Manafort鈥檚, this week acknowledged that in 2013.

Mr. Stone worked only briefly for Trump鈥檚 campaign, but remained an informal adviser. Now the Senate intelligence committee wants to talk to Stone, who says he had communicated with Guccifer 2.0, the hacker who allegedly breached the Democratic National Committee. Stone calls such contact 鈥渋nnocuous,鈥 .

What does all of this prove?

So far, nothing. Trump associates鈥 Russia connections and the Russian hacking scandal could be coincidental. Trump himself calls the whole Russia controversy But investigations are ongoing, and Trump鈥檚 own rhetoric has fueled speculation. During the campaign, he spoke admiringly of Putin鈥檚 leadership and called for improved US-Russia ties, glossing over in recent years.

Trump has had his over the years, mainly involving his real estate empire. He last visited Moscow in 2013 for the Miss Universe pageant, which he then owned, and also (unsuccessfully) .

The most recent Trump-Russia connection centers on the establishment of between Moscow and Trump. Erik Prince, founder of US security firm Blackwater and brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, reportedly met with a Russian close to Putin in January in the Seychelles islands. On its face, there is nothing wrong with such a back channel, but it gives one more data point to those suspicious of Trump鈥檚 ties to Russia.

Why did Devin Nunes recuse himself from his committee investigation?

As chairman of the House intelligence committee, Nunes 鈥 along with ranking Democrat Adam Schiff of California 鈥 was leading an investigation into Russian meddling in the election. But last month, Nunes visited a source in the White House complex to view classified documents, then briefed Trump (and the media) on what he found: information that he said showed Trump transition figures may have been caught up in legal surveillance. Trump claimed vindication for his March 4 tweets saying he had been wiretapped before the election.

Democrats had accused Nunes of trying to help Trump, and called for him to step down from the investigation. He resisted until Thursday, calling the charges against him 鈥渇alse and politically motivated.鈥

What did Susan Rice do, and was it wrong?

Obama's former national security adviser 鈥渦nmasked鈥 the names of Americans associated with Trump, who were mentioned in foreign surveillance reports but not by name. They were not being surveilled, but they were talking to foreigners who were.

On Wednesday, Trump that Rice and other Obama administration officials may have committed a crime in 鈥渦nmasking鈥 Trump associates.

So far, there is no evidence that Rice did anything wrong. As a senior administration official with high-level security clearance, Rice had the right to request that the Americans' identities be made known to her. The relevant intelligence agency must approve the unmasking, as a check on politically motivated activity.

Unmasking is not the same as leaking.

Rice cannot publicly comment on whether she did or did not unmask Trump associates, since the report in question is classified. But she has since the 鈥渦nmasking鈥 story broke.

"The allegation is that somehow the Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes," Rice told Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC Tuesday. "That's absolutely false."

, however, have called into question Rice's recent response when asked about Nunes's allegation that Trump associates had been swept up in incidental surveillance. "I know nothing about this," she told the "PBS Newshour" on March 22 鈥 a response that wouldn't add up if this week's reports are true.

So does the 'unmasking' story vindicate Trump鈥檚 claim that he was surveilled?

Not exactly. But it fans the flames. And it gives Trump a way to deflect attention from the investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, and whether his campaign colluded with the Russian government.

Trump and Republicans maintain that leaks by unnamed government officials on Trump associates鈥 contacts with Russian officials represent an effort by the so-called 鈥渄eep state鈥 to undermine Trump. Exhibit A is a that cited nine sources in revealing that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak before Trump took office.

Also at issue is the identity of the 鈥渟enior US government official鈥 who leaked Flynn鈥檚 name to Washington Post columnist David Ignatius . That was the first time Flynn was identified in the press as having misrepresented his interactions with Kislyak. Revealing the contents of 鈥渟ignals intelligence鈥 is a felony.