º£½Ç´óÉñ

Boy Scouts delay decision on gay membership

The board of the Boy Scouts determined it needed more time to consider its policy banning gay people from participating. The board delayed the policy vote until a national meeting scheduled for May. A coalition of faith-based groups pushed for the delay. 

This photo shows a close up detail of a Boy Scout uniform worn by Brad Hankins, a campaign director for Scouts for Equality in Irving, Texas on Monday. The Boy Scouts will decide whether to end its ban on gay participants in May.

AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez

February 6, 2013

°Õ³ó±ðÌýBoy Scouts of AmericaÌýon Wednesday delayed to May a vote on whether to end a longstanding controversial ban on gay participants, giving a membership deeply divided by the possible change more time to air their concerns.

Board members for the private youth organization, which turns 103 years old on Friday, had been expected to vote on the matter at a meeting on Wednesday. The Boy ScoutsÌýupheld the ban just last year amid sharp criticism from gay rights groups.

The Boy ScoutsÌýtouched off fierce lobbying by groups both for and against changing the policy when it said on Jan. 28 that it was considering removing a national restriction based on sexual orientation and leaving the decision to local chapters.

Top gerrymandering foe faces internal crisis as Trump pushes to redraw the maps

Even PresidentÌýBarack Obama, who favors lifting the ban, andÌýTexasÌý³Ò´Ç±¹±ð°ù²Ô´Ç°ùÌýRick Perry, an Eagle Scout who supports the ban, weighed in ahead of theÌýBoy Scout's national executive board meeting this week near its headquarters inÌýIrving,ÌýTexas.

"In the past two weeks, Scouting has received an outpouring of feedback from the American public," the Boy ScoutsÌýsaid in a statement that noted it had considered "extensive dialogue" within the membership and outside comments.

The board has concluded that "due to the complexity of this issue, the organization needs time for a more deliberate review of its membership policy," the statement added.

The Boy ScoutsÌýsaid the roughly 1,400 voting members of itsÌýnational councilÌýwill take action on a membership standards resolution at its national meeting in May.

A coalition of 33 faith-based councils that represent about one-fifth of all youth members in the Boy ScoutsÌýhad asked the board to delay the vote. Reaction to the delay was swift.

Where did your shrimp dinner really come from? This reporter surfaces hard details.

"This is no doubt a major victory for moral values, but it is a temporary one," saidÌýJonathan Saenz, president ofÌýTexasÌýº£½Ç´óÉñ, a group that organized a vigil supporting the ban on Wednesday and the parent of a Scout.

Zach Wahls, an Eagle Scout who has two lesbian mothers and is the founder of ScoutsÌýfor Equality, called the delay "an abdication of responsibility."

"By postponing this decision," Wahls said in a statement, "the BSA has caved to those who argue that their anti-gay attitudes trump basic scouting values of kindness, courtesy and bravery."

American voters favor lifting ban: PollÌý

More than 22,800 people had registered comments with the Boy ScoutsÌýon the group's Facebook page from its announcement that it was considering lifting the ban until Wednesday's statement.

The debate about the ban follows a series of moves recognizing gay rights in theÌýUnited StatesÌýin the past year.

The U.S. military now permits gay and lesbian members to serve openly, and residents inÌýMaine,ÌýMarylandÌýandÌýWashingtonÌýstate voted to approve gay marriage in November, the first states to do so through the ballot box.

A national poll released byÌýQuinnipiac UniversityÌýon Wednesday found a solid majority of registered voters, 55 percent to 33 percent, favored ending the ban.

Men supported lifting the ban by 49 percent to 39 percent and women by 61 percent to 27 percent, according to the poll, which surveyed 1,772 registered voters from Jan. 30 to Feb. 4 and had a 2.3 percentage points margin of error.

Gay rights activists, who have said it would not go far enough to lift the national ban but permit local bans to stand, said they were disappointed by the decision to put off a vote.

"A scout is supposed to be brave, and the Boy ScoutsÌýfailed to be brave today,"ÌýJennifer Tyrrell, a lesbian fromÌýOhioÌýwho was forced out as a den leader, said in a statement. "The Boy ScoutsÌýhad the chance to help countless young people and devoted parents, but they've failed us yet again."

Tyrrell and other activists delivered more than 1.4 million signatures to the Boy ScoutsÌýon Monday on petitions seeking an end to the policy.

The Boy ScoutsÌýwon a 5-4ÌýU.S. Supreme CourtÌýruling in 2000 that upheld its right to ban gays, but the organization has come under increasing public pressure in recent years from activists.

Youth membership in the organization, which prides itself on teaching boys life skills such as camping and leadership, has declined 21 percent to less than 2.7 million since 2000.

Gay rights activists have also been pressing corporations, including United Parcel Service Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Intel Corp, to withhold contributions to the Boy ScoutsÌýwhile the ban stands.

The Boy ScoutsÌýalso face criticism for keeping from public view decades of reports on child sex abuse in the organization. It released thousands of pages of files covering 1965 to 1985 in October under a court order.

Two board members have said publicly they support a change:ÌýJim Turley, chairman and chief executive ofÌýErnst & Young, and AT&T Inc CEO Randall Stephenson. A spokeswoman for Turley and spokesman for Stephenson said on Wednesday they declined to comment on the board's decision to delay a vote until May.