海角大神

Boston Marathon bombings: What Russia told FBI, or didn't, still at issue

Those familiar with the Marathon bombing investigation say the FBI might have benefited from details it requested but never received from Russia, yet missed the significance of at least one key detail it had in hand.

House Homeland Security Committee members Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D) of California (l.) and Rep. William Keating (D) of Massachusetts huddle on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, April 9, 2014, during the House Homeland Security Committee hearing about the Boston Marathon bombings leading up to the year anniversary of the attack.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

April 10, 2014

Leaked snippets from a still-secret internal government report on the聽Boston Marathon bombings nearly a year ago suggest US law enforcement authorities missed, or were denied, key details that might have spurred investigation of the man suspected of being the architect of the attack, potentially heading it off.

The Russian government declined to give the Federal Bureau of Investigation follow-up information it requested about Tamerlan Tsarnaev, details 鈥渢hat would most likely have led to more extensive scrutiny of him at least two years before the attack,鈥 The New York Times reported in its Thursday edition, citing a still unreleased federal review.

That federal review, according to anonymous sources that had seen it, largely exonerates the FBI of allegations that it failed to investigate fully those leads it already had, including a 2011 Russian warning that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was on the verge of becoming a radicalized Islamist. Tamerlan, who was killed following a shootout with police days after the Marathon bombings, was the older brother of the surviving suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who is in prison awaiting trial.

The Supreme Court has given Trump early wins. Now, it has to explain why.

On the other hand, the Russian warnings that were given to the FBI and CIA about Tamerlan鈥檚 potential radicalization are now newly reported to have included a prediction that he would change his name, The Boston Globe reported Thursday.

Just six weeks after returning from Dagestan in July 2012, Tamerlan tried to legally change his first name to 鈥淢uaz,鈥 the Globe reported. If overlooked by the FBI, that would be a major missed signal, some say. That鈥檚 because such name changes fit closely with a pattern among would-be jihadis turning toward radicalization and could have prompted investigation of a dangerous turn by Tamerlan.

鈥淭hat alert apparently failed to raise alarms [among US investigators] when Tsarnaev formally sought the name 鈥楳uaz,鈥 an early Islamic scholar鈥 in the fall of 2012, just months before the bombing, the Globe reported.

Together, these two seemingly contradictory reports suggest the FBI might well have benefited from additional details it requested but never received from the Russians 鈥 yet missed the significance of at least one key detail it had in hand, some of those familiar with the investigation said.

鈥淭hat would have been one more red flag,鈥 Rep. William Keating (D) of Massachusetts told the Globe concerning his discovery of the name-change issue during a briefing by Russian intelligence officials on a congressional trip to Moscow in January. 鈥淚t would have been one more thing we were warned about that was happening.鈥

Portland鈥檚 ICE office is already federally protected. So why is the National Guard needed?

The Globe鈥檚 report is based largely on the testimony of Congressman Keating, who said the Russians read him a copy of the letter sent to the FBI and the CIA while he took notes. He was not given a copy of the letter.

鈥淚t鈥檚 amazing how much information they did know, the Russians,鈥 Keating told the Globe. 鈥淟ook at everything that鈥檚 there. The change of the name, that鈥檚 corroborated. That he wanted to travel back to Russia, that鈥檚 been corroborated. That he wanted to enlist with extremists, that鈥檚 corroborated. I mean, everything that was in that [warning] has been corroborated.鈥

Such reports also suggest that rather than being exonerated, the FBI will have to endure a lot more second-guessing in the coming weeks and months as details emerge from the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev that is expected to start in November. Dzokhar faces 30 federal charges for the bombing that killed three people and wounded 260 others. Prosecutors have said they will seek the death penalty.

鈥淲e are going to learn a lot more about Tamerlan鈥檚 path to radicalization and who knew what about it as more government investigation details are released and as this trial gets underway,鈥 Charles Kurzman, a terrorism expert at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, says in an interview.

But he says one of the ironies of such hyper-detailed news media reporting 鈥 and the attendant leaks and spin that accompany it 鈥 is an exaggeration in the public mind of the threat from 鈥渉ome grown鈥 Muslim extremists. Instead of a spate of copycat attacks widely predicted in the aftermath of the Boston bombing, data show that Muslim extremism in the US is sagging, he notes.

Sixteen Muslim-Americans were indicted for or killed during violent terrorist plots in 2013, similar to the 2012 total of 14, bringing the total since 9/11 to 225, or less than 20 per year, concluded a February study on Muslim-American terrorism by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security.

In 2013, in addition to the alleged Boston Marathon bombers, six other individuals plotted attacks in the US, the fewest since 2008, the report found. Since 9/11, Muslim-American terrorism has resulted in 37 deaths in the US compared with more than 190,000 murders in this period, Dr. Kurzman鈥檚 study found. There were approximately 14,000 murders in 2013 alone.

鈥淚t鈥檚 ironic that every new development, and all the reporting on it, tends overall to makes people inordinately afraid far out of proportion to the scale of the threat we鈥檝e seen,鈥 he says.