No more Google ads for payday loans: consumer protection or censorship?
The search giant will ban payday loans from its ad system starting in July, it announced Wednesday.
Men with laptops stand in front of a projection of the Google logo. The search giant announced Wednesday it will ban payday loans from its ad system starting July 13.
Dado Ruvic/AP
As government regulators seek toÌýfurther restrict the contentious practices of certain payday lenders, Google wasn't interested inÌýwaiting.ÌýÌý
The search giant willÌýÌýstarting in July, it announced Wednesday.ÌýÌý
TheÌýact has drawnÌýpraiseÌýfromÌýconsumer protection, civil liberty and privacy advocates because payday loansÌýareÌýsaid toÌýprey on low-income borrowers, who can become entangled in aÌývicious web of missed payments, with interest rates that can be more than 700Ìýpercent.
But, the lending industry, in its backfire against the announcement, has raised aÌýquestion:ÌýShouldÌýGoogle, or any search engine or social media website,Ìýsuppress content?ÌýÌý
The Community Financial Services Association of America (CFSA), a trade association for the payday lending industry, has called the move ""
"The Internet is meant to express the free flow of ideas and enhance commerce," a spokesperson for the CFSA told WIRED. "Google is making a blanket assessment about the payday lending industry rather than discerning the good actors from the bad actors. This is unfair towards those that are legal, licensed lenders and uphold best business practices, including members of CFSA."Ìý
Google said it will banÌýcertainÌýtypesÌýof payday loans, particularlyÌýones that must be repaid within 60 days orÌýwith interest rates of 36 percent or higher, according to theÌýannouncement from David Graff, Google's director of product policy. It will becomeÌýeffectiveÌýJuly 13. AlthoughÌýlenders will no longer to be able to advertise on the search engine, usersÌýwillÌýstill be able to search for them. Ìý
This is far from the first time GoogleÌýhas restricted content from its ad system or search engine. It has prohibited ads for illicitÌýactivities such as the sale ofÌý, and limited activities that are sexually explicit or graphic in nature, as The Washington Post reports. In 2015 alone, Google disabledÌý, including ones forÌýweight loss scams, phishing and unwanted software.ÌýBut Google's most recent policy will be the first time it will globally banÌýads for aÌý"broad category of financial products,"Ìýaccording to the Post.ÌýÌý
"Ads for financial services are a particular area of vigilance given how core they are to people's livelihood and well being," wrote Graff. "When ads are good, they connect people to interesting, useful brands, businesses and products. Unfortunately, not all ads are."ÌýÌý
Payday loans are short-termÌýloans, oftenÌý, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The loansÌýare frequently for $500 or less.ÌýAlthoughÌýthey offer fast cash to low-income earners, they can come at a price, mainlyÌýhigh interest rates. The average yearly interest rate of lump-sum loansÌýwasÌý650 percent, the Pew Charitable Trust found in 2012, while online installment loans, which are paid back in smaller increments, .
Internet payday loans often automatically withdraw from a borrower's account, which, if the account isÌýoverdrawn, can slam a borrower with bank penalties. The averageÌýÌýfrom online payday loans is $185, according to the Consumer FinancialÌýProtectionÌýBureau (CFPB).ÌýÌý
The CFPB, which was created by President Obama in response to the recession, is expected to release further regulations to restrict the industry later this year. State legislatures have targeted some practices, but the industry has frequently managed to find work-arounds, as the Associated Press reported.Ìý
OpponentsÌýto government intervention, however, have said the limits amount to paternalism.Ìý
"Americans don't need their money managed by paternalist politicians," Tim Miller, writing at the time as a spokesperson for the Center for Consumer Freedom, a nonprofitÌýpromoting personal responsibility and consumer choices, said in a 2008Ìýopinion article for º£½Ç´óÉñ. Ìý
"Government should instead trust that, when given personal freedom and the maximum amount of options, consumers can decide how to responsibly use their money themselves," he wrote. Ìý