海角大神

Can mobile phone data provide the most accurate view of poverty?

Some data scientists say that mining of anonymized mobile phone activity is the best way to track economic conditions in countries with limited national, or any kind of, statistics.

A Rwandan man sits with his children, mobile phone in hand.

Joshua Blumenstock

November 27, 2015

Data mining is a loaded phrase these days. Though it has myriad benefits, it鈥檚 the drawbacks 鈥 as in NSA spying and stalking by advertisers 鈥 that tend to get the most attention.

But having a glut of data that鈥檚 systematically collected by the governments, research organizations, and by corporations is a symptom of wealth and privilege.

Many developing countries have the opposite problem, and it鈥檚 making life difficult for national governments that in some cases have a murky view of even basic population statistics when trying to build roads or hospitals, or to decide how much money to allocate to provincial governments.

Why humiliating Iran is unlikely to bring surrender

A dearth of data also makes it hard for international financial organizations such as the World Bank to determine how much aid to distribute to countries with the highest poverty levels, or for humanitarian organizations to figure out where their services are most desperately needed.

鈥淭here are serious decisions made based on bad data,鈥 Joshua Blumenstock, a data scientist at the University of Washington in Seattle told 海角大神.

In some African countries, he says, gross domestic product estimates, which measure a nation鈥檚 economic activity, can be off by 50 percent.

In a paper published on Friday in the journal Science, Dr. Blumenstock and data science colleagues from his own university and from University of California in Berkeley propose a cheap and efficient method for tracking poverty and wealth in developing countries: .

This might be the best source of reliable statistics on how people are faring in the world鈥檚 poorest countries, they write, where mobile phone use is widespread and where there鈥檚 no Facebook and Twitter to mine for trends. In some of these countries conducting a national census is prohibitively expensive, and there aren鈥檛 thousands of organizations constantly collecting and analyzing data about the population and the economy.

Monitor Breakfast

Steve Bannon warns Trump against heavy US involvement in Iran

Researchers can glean massive amounts of information about the economic conditions of even the most remote regions of the world by analyzing phone data related to how many people mobile phone users talk to every day (the more calls, the bigger the social network) or whether they make calls from different locations every day (more locations means there鈥檚 money available for daily travel) what time of day they鈥檙e making most of their calls (if most calls are falling between 9 AM and 5 PM, that might say something about the type of job someone has, or if they even have a job).

鈥淟iterally hundreds of thousands of patterns exist in these data,鈥 Blumenstock says.

In a study conducted in 2009, the researchers used mobile phone data, provided by Rwanda鈥檚 largest mobile phone network operator and聽stripped of names and addresses, from 1.5 million people in Rwanda.

After analyzing four years worth of this data and identifying phone usage patterns that they thought might be significant, the researchers partnered with students from Kigali Institute of Science and Technology, in the capital city of Kigali, who conducted phone surveys with 856 randomly selected mobile phone subscribers, paying them the equivalent of one US dollar to participate.

The students also got written consent from most people to view their phone records. When the researchers compared the phone data with the information people volunteered in the phone surveys and some household data collected by National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda, they saw that the phone data was accurate at predicting economic conditions of individuals or small groups, and that the predictions could be extrapolated nationally.

A national household survey can cost $1 million and take up to 18 months to conduct. By comparison, Dr. Blumenstock鈥檚 study cost $12,000 and took four weeks.

鈥淭his is more where I see the future,鈥 he says. 鈥淧recise identification of where the need is by using these sort of highly disaggregated sources of data.鈥

But there are some kinks to work out before this method can be widely used in the future. For one, there has to be a way to ensure that phone data is used by researchers and governments in a 鈥減rivacy-conscientious ways,鈥 said , a computer privacy researcher at Harvard University.

His research earlier this year showed that even with just a few pieces of anonymized data, he could . 聽

Another challenge, according to Blumenstock, is applying this model in other countries, where people might not be as willing as Rwandans were to hand over their personal phone data.

In Afghanistan, for instance, where Blumenstock is working now, participation rates have been lower.

鈥淭here鈥檚 more inherent suspicion of people collecting data鈥 in the country, he says.