海角大神

'Charlton Heston' is a voluminous, possibly definitive, study of a Hollywood paragon of masculinity

A portrait of the actor who gave life to the larger-than-life.

Dense biographies about high-wattage Hollywood stars with limited acting chops can be tricky business for a writer and a reader alike. The former has to instill in the latter a belief in why we should care beyond yet another exegesis of celebrity, while readers, ideally, find a way to open themselves to seeing old works anew.

Marc Eliot has this kind of challenge in hand with Charlton Heston: Hollywood鈥檚 Last Icon 鈥� a voluminous, and possibly definitive, study one of the big screen鈥檚 paragons of brawn and masculinity. Its subject looms large in our cultural memory while remaining a limited thespian whose go-to move was leaning forward, iron jaw extended, as if forever contemplating where to get a good steak.

But if Heston lacked range, he didn鈥檛 lack self-consciousness. He was an ardent diarist, and those writings are counted on to provide new vantage points, Heston鈥檚 prose teaming up with Eliot鈥檚, as it were, in a joint mission to tell us why we should care more than we already do about this Tinsel Town icon.

For starters, we should care because of the people Heston worked with, and what his relationship with them reveals. Consider, for example, Orson Welles, with whom Heston paired in 1957 to film the still incredibly odd, incredibly creepy B-noir "Touch of Evil." Throughout this book we see Heston launching himself into intense workouts to get in shape for his parts, like he鈥檚 training for some epic last-man-standing competition, with lots of tennis worked in. He often comes off as a pawn for cagey directors but a thinking pawn all the same, with a sensitive B.S. detector making up the deficiencies of top-shelf mental acumen. In college he screened and loved "Citizen Kane," and it was Heston who got Welles the directing gig for "Touch of Evil," when no one in Hollywood would so much as prod Welles鈥檚 corpulent midsection with a barge pole.

Like so many Welles projects before it, "Touch of Evil" was hamstrung by what producers considered over-artiness, with Heston quite rightly realizing that he was a pretend star 鈥� behind Welles 鈥� in a picture that was only being made because he could draw an audience. Heston found himself having to act as go-between for the studio with an increasingly disconsolate director, who believed his leading man was a turncoat in part responsible for shearing his vision from him.

But outings like this one were the exceptions, of course. Heston was an action man, and Eliot鈥檚 book is structured around the monuments of his stardom: films like "The Ten Commandments," "Ben-Hur," and "Planet of the Apes." It鈥檚 a list that not only defines Heston鈥檚 career but a considerable chunk of what is still well remembered from Hollywood in the late 1950s and 1960s. If you鈥檝e seen any film in your life outside of a Netflix-and-chill context in the most perfunctory film class 鈥� or hell, if you just ever leave the TV on at Easter 鈥� you鈥檝e assuredly seen at least one of them. And if you鈥檝e not seen "Planet of the Apes," you鈥檝e seen its ending spoofed somewhere.聽Heston鈥檚 physicality and the toll taken by the "Ben-Hur" shooting were integral, we see, to his performance. Worn down, almost like he鈥檇 been rubbed into the nitrate itself, Heston cries real tears as his character watches the Christ figure die in the film鈥檚 final shot. You watch the performance and you鈥檙e surprised, perhaps, how truly this stoic figure is emoting, with some context now worked in to flesh out one鈥檚 understanding of a scene. "Ben-Hur" becomes even more human a picture, and there even seems to be something preternatural about the fact that Heston performed all but two parts of the epic chariot race.

Eliot鈥檚 portrait of Heston鈥檚 life does take some turns off the set, and we catch glimpses of a fascinating political figure, so far as actors go, one considerably more protean than we now think 鈥� teaming with Martin Luther King, Jr. one moment and regularly stumping for the NRA the next. (In fact, Heston鈥檚 positions on guns are more nuanced than the anti-firearm brigade would likely expect.) But Eliot鈥檚 clear preference is the world of film, putting us right there with Heston as he mulls scripts, trains, launches himself bodily and mentally 鈥� both so far as each aspect of him went 鈥� into epics, biopics, big pictures, small pictures, more or less equally.

"Heston: is at its best here, revealing its subject as downright ruminative while working on "The Ten Commandments," having prepped to the hilt to ready himself to play Moses. You even get the sense of some bonding/twining across the ages going on between the Red Sea parter and the Hollywood hunk: 鈥淎ll the Mosaic literature I鈥檓 working through, all the times I鈥檝e read the script, mean little compared to the weeks I鈥檝e spent wearing Moses鈥檚 clothes and breathing the air he knew.鈥� A post-shooting bath prompts a joke about trying to part the water in the tub. You don鈥檛 expect sly wit from Heston. But when you see it on view in these pages, you realize how his performances gained in power from that push-and-pull between what was emoted and what was held back 鈥� which fosters a unique actorly visual all its own. After all, a biographer could always provide a more fulsomely emotional display 鈥� almost like production notes for a life and career 鈥� and now one has.