How are Venezuela's media covering the protests?
鈥�听David Smilde is the moderator of WOLA's blog:听.听The views expressed are the author's own.
[Yesterday's] protest and speech by Leopoldo L贸pez by television news channel Globovisi贸n. At least in part. Globovisi贸n split their screen so that they could transmit the opposition protest and government march at the same time and also cut away from the speech before L贸pez was done.
This, however, was a significant improvement over media coverage of the violence during the Feb.12 march (see David鈥檚 ).
That day when the student鈥檚 protests turned increasingly violent, private television听stations stopped their live coverage of the incidents. Globovisi贸n, the news channel that used to be considered the main pro-opposition media but , had initially given ample 鈥� but not live 鈥� coverage to the protests. But as soon as violence erupted in the afternoon, they switched to a fashion program.
Public television channels did not cover any of the opposition protests, concentrating instead on a commemorating the anniversary of La Victoria battle of the war of independence.
People with access to cable television services turned to the Colombia-based news channel for live coverage of the incidents. As violence erupted, the channel broadcasted videos reportedly filmed by protestors showing Venezuelan police officers firing on protestors. The government ordered cable providers to take NTN24 out of their grids. Viewers reported by twitter that by leaving the channel on it could still be viewed in Venezuela, but as soon as it was changed or the cable set turned off and on again, the image was lost. The web page of the channel was also blocked from access in Venezuela. But it was available live on Youtube.com.
declaring: 鈥渁 television channel [NTN24] that is trying to compete with Telesur [Venezuelan government backed Latin American news television听channel], attempted to broadcast the chaos of a coup d鈥櫭﹖at鈥 had to defend Venezuela鈥檚 peace.鈥� He also scolded Agence France-Presse news service for using local reporters to 鈥渉arm the truth about Venezuela.鈥�
The president of the government鈥檚 media control agency CONATEL, William Castillo, also warned via twitter against international coverage of the protests: 鈥淲e call upon the international media to respect the Venezuelan people. The promotion of violence and the lack of recognition of authorities is a crime [in Venezuela].鈥�
On the evening of Feb. 13, Twitter users in Venezuela reported that they were unable to upload images and videos to their accounts. Social media networks such as Twitter had been used during the day to upload images of the protests. that the Venezuelan government had, through its web provider CANTV, blocked the service to the country. But in contrast to the way President Maduro assumed responsibility for censuring NTN24, .
to the television blackout of April 12 - 13 of 2002. After the coup against former President Hugo Ch谩vez on that date, Television stations听chose to broadcast cartoons instead of covering live the popular protests and military realignments and movements that eventually brought Mr. Ch谩vez back to power.
Paradoxically that 2002 case of concerted information blackout by the media has been repeatedly used by the Venezuelan government as an argument for the need to closely control private media. Furthermore, have justified the recent censorship precisely in order to preclude a repetition of the 2002 coup.
Before last week鈥檚 student protests, that private television channels were fueling criminal violence by broadcasting programs that carried 鈥渁nti-values of capitalism.鈥� He added that the new Pacification Plan would include measures to purge that 鈥渃ulture of violence鈥� from the media.
On the days before the Feb. 12 protests and the media blackout, tensions seemed to have been building up inside Globovisi贸n. On Feb. 11 for example, a long-time lead reporter of the channel, that his daily program Primera Plana had been canceled and that he had therefore been de facto sacked from Globovisi贸n.
Then on Feb. 13, during the protests, the channel鈥檚 quit her job because of her disagreement over the editorial line and the lack of coverage of the events. Another Globovisi贸n reporter, Betriz Adri谩n, tweeted during the day: 鈥渟everal of the reporters asked that [Globovisi贸n] broadcast what was happening in both events [government acts and opposition protests]. But it was impossible.鈥� popular journalists and news anchors such as Leopoldo Castillo, Carla Angola, 鈥淜iko鈥� Bautista, Gladys Rodr铆guez, and Roman Lozinski have quit the channel because of changes in its editorial line.听
On Feb. 15, several journalist organizations in which they analyzed the situation and called for unity among journalists and a renewed push to provide independent coverage.
On Feb. 16听 claiming objectivity and neutrality in its news coverage and adding: 鈥淲e disagree with the use of broadcast media as an instrument for agitation, propaganda, or confrontation, and with its use as a weapon to attack the well being of the nation or to alter the social stability of the country.鈥�
Pressures regarding news coverage have also affected print media. Journalists at Venezuela鈥檚 largest daily newspaper 脷ltimas Noticias were upset on Feb. 13 when UN did not give front page coverage to the deaths of three students. However, on Sunday, Ultimas Noticias published on its web page a describing and analyzing internet videos and pictures of the protests and the violence in downtown Caracas on Feb. 12.
The analysis seems to corroborate denunciations of police officers from the Servicio Bolivariano de Inteligencia (SEBIN) and non-uniformed motorcyclists firing at students with hand guns. On a national cadena, broadcast that airs on all channels, on Feb. 16, that a group of SEBIN officers did fire at protestors. He suggested that they had not remained in their barracks as ordered.
鈥� 听David Smilde is the moderator of WOLA's blog:听.听
