Even as South America tilts right, a leftist legacy stands strong
Loading...
| Mexico City
Ecuador鈥檚 leftist candidate Len铆n Moreno squeaked into office this weekend in what was a noteworthy win in a region tipping increasingly to the right.
But even amid the recent political shifts, one thing has become clear: whether a leader is left or right, the so-called 鈥淧ink Tide鈥 of leftist leaders that defined the first decade and a half of this century has fundamentally changed the region.
Latin America remains one of the most unequal places in the world, but the gains in education, health care, and the upward mobility of the poor are improvements voters are not willing to let disappear. Conservatives today have to convince the electorate that despite whatever changes they promise to usher in, they won鈥檛 dismantle the social gains brought to shore by the Pink Tide.
鈥淭here are higher demands and expectations of the government,鈥 in Latin America today, says Michael Shifter, the president of the Inter-American Dialogue, a think tank based in DC. 鈥淭he people who benefited [under leftist leadership] don鈥檛 want to slip back into poverty and won鈥檛 tolerate or accept governments that plan to completely roll back those programs.鈥
Voters may be looking for a leadership change as the commodity boom that funded widespread investment in social policies and attention to the poor has faded into stagnation or recession across the region, and as corruption scandals are increasingly coming to light.
But 鈥渆ven though these governments are strapped fiscally, they can鈥檛 afford to go back to the recipe of the 1990s. These societies have fundamentally transformed,鈥 Shifter says.
A decade of social gains
Unlike Peru, Argentina, and Brazil, where right-leaning leaders have taken over; or Venezuela, where the conservative opposition gained control of the National Assembly;听or Bolivia, where the leftist leader was barred from running for reelection in 2019, outgoing Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa鈥檚 handpicked successor landed 51 percent of Sunday鈥檚 vote.
The results are contested by former banker Guillermo Lasso, who was ahead in some exit polls, and who has called on his supporters to protest the results.听
Latin America has long been defined by its inequality. For decades it was governed in an 鈥渦s vs. them manner, where 鈥榯hem鈥 was all of the population outside of the political elite,鈥 says Eric Farnsworth, the vice president of the Washington-based Council of the Americas.
But as commodity prices shot up in the early 2000s and leftist governments rose to power and implemented broader social spending, social indicators improved dramatically. Between 2003 and 2012, the region halved the number of people in extreme poverty (living on less than $2.50 per day), according to the World Bank. Public education and healthcare spending made up the bulk of social investment, and social spending as a whole increased from roughly 11 percent of GDP to 15 percent on average across the region.
There have also been concrete gains for the region鈥檚 indigenous population, long pushed to the margins, even in countries like Bolivia, where they make up the majority of the population. According to the United Nations, between 2004 and 2014 this population saw improvements in health, education, and political participation across Latin America.
Many Latin American countries developed a middle class for the first time during this period, which largely kicked off with the election of Venezuela鈥檚 former firebrand president, Hugo Ch谩vez, in 1999. The increases in social programming 鈥 from public health clinics in low-income neighborhoods in Venezuela, to cash transfer programs incentivizing parents to keep their kids in school in Brazil, to听building more hospitals in Ecuador听鈥撎齦ed to rising expectations about what people鈥檚 lives could 鈥 and should 鈥撎齦ook like.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 think any of these countries are going to go back to the years of 鈥榰s vs. them,鈥欌 Mr. Farnsworth says. 鈥淚t鈥檚 not a politically viable strategy anymore. In every election starting with Venezuela [the听National Assembly election in 2015], the opposition candidate has clearly said 鈥榃e aren鈥檛 going back on social gains, we鈥檙e going to try to implement policies to make these social gains more sustainable.鈥欌
That may have been Mr. Lasso鈥檚 downfall in Ecuador. Although the razor-thin margin of the vote clearly indicates a desire for change, Lasso was painted as a candidate ready to cut social spending in order to pay off the country鈥檚 debt.
A study on Ecuador鈥檚 first-round vote by the Universidad Andina Sim贸n Bol铆var (UASB) found that voters that made up the new middle class, which emerged over the past 10 years, pushed Moreno to victory.
鈥淭his part of the population [that saw gains in social investment and infrastructure] benefitted from social mobility and the possibility of consumption for the first time鈥 under Mr. Correa, says Pablo Ospina, a professor of global and social studies at UASB in Quito. 鈥淭hey feared a new government would change this. People here don鈥檛 wait for miracles when it comes to politicians, so the fact that Correa gave them something over the past 10 years, even if just a little, led to this vote鈥 for his former vice president, Moreno.
Getting the message
Outside of Ecuador, South America鈥檚 more conservative opposition candidates seem to be catching on. In Venezuela, democratic institutions are increasingly crumbling as Ch谩vez鈥檚 successor, President Nicol谩s Maduro, tries to hang on to power, despite the loss of one of 颁丑补惫颈蝉尘辞鈥s most powerful tools: oil revenues. But the opposition was able to take over the National Assembly in 2015 in part by assuring voters that they had no plans to roll back social benefits. Instead, they would focus on trying to restructure how benefits are funded. Argentina鈥檚 new President Mauricio Macri took similar steps.
鈥淢acri understood that it was not politically possible to roll back social programs and govern the country. He has lifted some subsidies and made economic policy changes, but he has preserved some social welfare measures.鈥 Without that things would get too turbulent,鈥 says Mr. Shifter.
But there are incentives to vote for change in South America, analysts say.听Despite the popularity of social welfare among the poor and middle class, the emergence of high-profile corruption scandals and slowing economies are putting regional voters on edge.
鈥淲ith the economic insecurity now, there is fear that people will fall back economically. Today, the vote isn鈥檛 just [based on] promises about the future, but the fact that life has the potential of getting worse,鈥 says Farnsworth.
Money from South America鈥檚 economic windfall of the early 2000s wasn鈥檛 generally invested 鈥 it was spent. After years of 5 percent to 6.5 percent growth, regional economies are suffering. It鈥檚 affecting how governments can spend, and it鈥檚 also making the revelations of high-profile corruption schemes bite even more.
鈥淧eople are starting to ask, 鈥榃here did all that money go?鈥欌 says Farnsworth. 鈥淭he money was used on current consumption, payments to political supporters, and poverty alleviation programs. Nothing was invested in a way that would add economic returns in the long term. Nothing was saved for a rainy day.鈥
Today鈥檚 conservative opposition is largely focusing on ways to preserve social programs while changing how they fund them, analysts say. And for the rare cases where the left maintains power, like Ecuador, observers expect the leader鈥檚 behavior may have to change as well.听
鈥淲e aren鈥檛 just seeing a shift within the right, but the left, too,鈥 says Mr. Ospina. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a reflection of a society that wants more sustainable change, and candidates who are realizing social investment can鈥檛 continue the way it was under the commodity boom.鈥
One result is that new leftist leaders like Moreno 鈥渨ill be held more accountable than鈥 their predecessors, says Larry Birns, the director of the Washington-based Council on Hemispheric Affairs. 鈥淭he population will keep him on a shorter leash.鈥
Whether the Pink Tide will be remembered for the social gains it brought across the region or the corruption coming to light today, 鈥渢he electorate is forever changed,鈥 says Shifter. 鈥淏eyond just the economic expectations, there is also a new sense of pride and political participation. That鈥檚 going to continue鈥 no matter where the political pendulum swings.听