Judge to florist who refused same-sex wedding: You broke the law
It seems gay rights advocates have scored a victory this time.
A judge in Washington state has ruled that a florist broke a state anti-discrimination law when she refused to provide flowers for a gay couple鈥檚 wedding, .
Couple Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed sued Barronelle Stutzman, owner of Arlene鈥檚 Flowers in Richland, Wash., in 2013, after she refused to provide decorations for their wedding.
鈥淸I] told him that because of my relationship with Jesus Christ I couldn鈥檛 do that,鈥� Ms. Stutzman said, .
On Wednesday, Benton County Superior Court Judge Alexander Ekstrom ruled in favor of Mr. Ingersoll and Mr. Freed.
鈥淚n trade and commerce, and particularly when seeking to prevent discrimination in public accommodations, the Courts have confirmed the power of the Legislative branch to prohibit conduct it deems discriminatory, even where the motivation for that conduct is religious belief,鈥� Judge Ekstrom wrote in a 60-page opinion.
The decision is the latest scene in the drama of America鈥檚 gay rights debate. Over the last few months, anti-discriminatory suits have surfaced over everything from cakes to .
On Thursday, a clerk in Texas issued a marriage license to a same-sex couple for the first time in the state鈥檚 history, marking a big victory for advocates that state,聽.
Yet those who oppose gay rights have hardly backed down. In a powerful statement earlier this month, county probate judges in Alabama defied a federal court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in the state.
鈥淟ess than a quarter of the county probate judges were reported to be complying with the federal judge鈥檚 ruling, while the rest declined to issue licenses or kept their offices closed,鈥� 海角大神 reported聽at the time.聽
One federal judge in Alabama has since ordered a probate judge in Mobile to begin issuing marriage licenses to gay couples, but it鈥檚 yet unclear how broadly the order will apply throughout the state.
At the same time, the US public seems to lean in favor of gay rights advocates. A 2014 Gallup poll found that say same-sex marriage should be recognized by law 鈥� a great leap from 1996, when only 27 percent said gay marriages were valid.
As the debate goes back and forth between advocates and opponents, one suggestion for compromise has appeared from an unlikely corner.
In late January, Mormon leaders tried to find the middle ground between gay rights and religious freedom, 鈥渄emanding that both ideas, together, be treated as a national priority,鈥� .
In a move that a gay Utah state legislator labeled "historic," leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints for laws that protect gays, lesbians,聽bisexuals, and transgender people from discrimination, such as being denied jobs or housing because of their sexual orientation.
In return, they called for legislation that would safeguard the rights of those who say their beliefs compel them to oppose homosexuality, citing instances where people against same-sex marriage have been sanctioned, sued, or fired from their jobs.
The announcement, which does not alter the Mormon church's opposition to gay marriage, drew praise for being well-intentioned, but has also drawn criticism from both sides, with some saying that such a compromise would , and others saying that it 聽against LGBT people.聽
