Murkowski versus Miller: election or spelling bee?
Lisa Murkowski versus Joe Miller started as a contest for an Alaska Senate seat 鈥� but it may end up as a spelling bee.
On Wednesday Alaska election workers were scheduled to begin scrutinizing the more than 92,000 write-in ballots that will determine who wins the state鈥檚 contested Senate vote. If officials determine that enough of these say 鈥淢urkowski鈥� or 鈥淢erkowski鈥� or 鈥淢urcowski,鈥� or some other identifiable variant of incumbent Republican Sen. Murkowski鈥檚 name, then she鈥檒l (improbably) win reelection as a write-in over Mr. Miller, who won the GOP primary.
That鈥檚 quite probable, too, as write-ins constituted 40 percent of the submitted Alaska Senate ballots and Miller took 35 percent.
But Alaskans鈥� spelling ability is a big issue here. Miller on Tuesday sued to stop the state from using its own judgment to try and determine who individual write-in voters meant to support. Unless ballots are filled out perfectly 鈥� the circle indicating it鈥檚 a write-in marked in, and 鈥淟isa Murkowski" spelled correctly 鈥� they shouldn鈥檛 count, argue Miller鈥檚 lawyers.
In fact, misspellings should be counted against Murkowski, as they could be protest votes, according to the lawsuit.
Alaska Lt. Gov Craig Campbell, the person in charge of the matter, ruled that the count should proceed Wednesday as planned. The state will try to determine the intent of each write-in vote, according to Campbell. So relatively minor misspellings are OK. For now.
Still, Murkowski is probably wishing that her last name was something like 鈥淪mith.鈥� Or maybe 鈥淢iller鈥� 鈥� that鈥檚 an easy one. It could still be possible to mangle 鈥淢urkowski鈥� enough so that voter intent is hard to determine. Would 鈥淢ork鈥� count, for instance? We don鈥檛 know. 鈥淟isa M.鈥� or 鈥淟isa鈥� might not be good enough, as a woman named Lisa M. Lackey also ran as a write-in. Some 160 other write-in candidates declared for this election, in fact, so officials can鈥檛 be sure who won until they count them all.
The Murkowski campaign passed out silicone wristbands and ran lots of sing-song jingle commercials spelling out her name and urging voters to remember it, as write-in candidates have to do. Right now her lawyers are probably checking Alaska鈥檚 historic verbal SAT scores to gauge her chances.
As to what happens today, workers will sort write-in votes into five categories, according to .
One category will be inarguable Lisa Murkowski ballots 鈥� those filled out correctly, with 鈥淢urkowski鈥� spelled right.
One will be inarguable non-Lisa Murkowski ballots 鈥� those that have somebody else鈥檚 name.
The other categories will be confused votes, in which, say, 鈥淢iller鈥� is both written-in and marked off; extremely confused votes, which might have two names written in; and arguable votes, in which the write-in is a 鈥淢urkowski鈥� spelling variant. It鈥檚 that last category the lawyers will fight over.
