海角大神

With Donald Trump now vying with Jeb Bush for the top spot in the national polls for the Republican presidential nomination, one would think the media would begin more deeply investigating his stance on the issues or documenting his governing philosophy. Instead, this morning鈥檚 Sunday talk shows all featured discussion of The Bombastic One鈥檚 latest off-the-cuff personal attack, this one targeting Arizona Sen. John McCain for his recent description聽聽 The Donald, of course, is not one to miss an opportunity to engage in personal warfare against any critic (Rosie O鈥橠onnell anyone?) 鈥� indeed, he relishes these public feuds in no small part because he knows they provoke the media coverage that is partly responsible for fueling .

In this instance, Trump responded to McCain鈥檚 鈥渃razies鈥� comment by calling McCain 鈥渁 dummy." When asked Saturday at the Family Leadership summit about criticizing a war hero, Trump opined, 鈥淗e was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren鈥檛 captured.鈥� Because the media has focused on these two sentences, it鈥檚 worth putting The Donald鈥檚 comments in context 鈥� when asked about McCain 鈥� notice the audience reaction:

The Donald鈥檚 comments about McCain 鈥� as he intended 鈥� sucked up almost all the weekend media coverage, and left second-tier Republican candidates like Texas Gov. Rick Perry trying to bolster their own anemic polling by expressing outrage over Trump鈥檚 criticism of a decorated war veteran. That, of course, meant that they spent part of their brief media time talking about The Donald, rather than their own candidacies 鈥� which is precisely what The Bombastic One wants.

Trump鈥檚 media coverage to date reflects a basic weakness of how journalists cover elections more generally 鈥� one I鈥檝e talked聽: it tends to describe election contests in terms of candidate personalities and campaign tactics rather than focusing on candidates鈥� issue stances and expertise. In Trump鈥檚 case, we see these media tendencies illustrated in spades. But by characterizing Trump as a bombastic buffoon who shouldn鈥檛 be taken seriously (the left-leaning聽Huffington Post聽聽it would move its Trump coverage to the entertainment pages) journalists are playing directly into Trump鈥檚 hands. In fact, his polling support is coming from that part of the electorate that is increasingly dissatisfied with what it views as a corrupt political establishment, one that is not addressing bread-and-butter issues like job creation, trade policy, immigration reform, and border security. And the media, like it or not, is often viewed by these voters as part of that establishment.

As a classic example of how not to cover The Donald, look at聽聽with him today on ABC's 鈥淭his聽Week鈥澛爉orning show regarding his war hero comments. She repeatedly tries to publicly shame The Donald for his remarks and to insinuate that he is emotionally unfit to be president, but Trump adroitly uses the opportunity to double down on his earlier remarks and, not incidentally, to reach out to veterans. When the interview concludes Raddatz can barely prevent herself from rolling her eyes at The Donald鈥檚 remarks. However, I would not be surprised if Raddatz鈥檚 questions and demeanor actually bolstered Trump鈥檚 standing with a segment of Republican voters.

The problem with the media coverage, at root, is that its persistence in portraying The Donald as a cartoon figure is at odds with his undeniable accomplishments. While the media chases its tail in trying to hold the Donald accountable for his latest outrageous statement, he uses that coverage to cite his very real track record of getting things done, and to promise that he will reprise that record as president.

But it is, in fact, Trump's private sector experience (and concomitant lack of political experience) that is potentially the real vulnerability of his candidacy, if only the media would take the time to examine it. Consider the following anecdote provided by the late, great political scientist James Q. Wilson聽聽which is a study of how government works 鈥� or does not work, as the case might be. In the early 1980鈥檚, as Wilson tells the story, the city of New York spent some $13 million dollars across a six-year period in an ultimately fruitless effort to renovate the Central Park skating rink. At this point, The Donald stepped in and agreed to renovate the rink for $3 million, with any cost-overrun coming out of his own pocket. Mayor Ed Koch agreed to the deal. Trump completed the rink renovations a month ahead of schedule, and $750,000 under budget.

At first glance, this example seems to feed into The Donald鈥檚 argument that as president he would have the expertise and experience to get things accomplished. Indeed, that is precisely the mantra The Donald repeats at every campaign stop 鈥� his standard stump speech includes multiple statements that begin: 鈥淎s president, I will鈥� accomplish some objective, whether it means building a wall to keep out illegal immigrants, or negotiating a more favorable trade deal with the Chinese government, or any number of accomplishments.

But in reciting this story about the skating rink, Wilson is making a more subtle and important point, one that potentially undercuts the relevance of The Donald鈥檚 private sector experience as preparation to be president. Wilson is using the skating rink example to demonstrate how the very factors that made the Donald so effective in the private sector are rarely to be found in the political sphere. As Wilson acknowledges, The Donald proved far more efficient than did government in renovating the skating rink. But ultimately public policy is evaluated on more than narrow grounds of economic efficiency 鈥� instead, 鈥済overnment has many valued outputs, including a reputation for integrity, the confidence of the people, and the support of important interest groups.鈥� When it comes to skating rinks (or any government program), Wilson argues, 鈥淎 government that is slow to build rinks but is honest and accountable in its actions and properly responsive to worthy constituents may be a very efficient government, if we measure efficiency in the large by taking into account all its valued outputs.鈥� I would add that governing in the public sphere at the national level requires an understanding of how to address the interests of those, such as members of Congress, whose support is required if the president is to accomplish his objectives.

By extension, Wilson is suggesting that the tactics that work so well for The Donald in the private sector are unlikely to be as effective when it comes to passing public policy. This is because other values 鈥� accountability, transparency, and equity 鈥� are embedded in our political process to a degree not seen in private sector transactions. As president, The Donald will find that he cannot run roughshod over the political constraints built into our national system of separated institutions sharing power. Building a wall to keep out illegal immigrants will be nothing like renovating the Central Park skating rink, and that is not simply due to the different scale of the projects. It is because the incentives facing political actors, including the president, do not reward them for maximizing efficiency alone, at least in the narrow economic sense. Instead, to achieve one鈥檚 goals in the political sphere means utilizing tactics that emphasize 鈥渨e," not 鈥淚." Based on his public statements to date, it is not clear how well The Donald understands this.

So how should the media cover The Donald? Not by ignoring him, or聽聽as a 鈥渇arce to be reckoned with," Instead, journalists should take his candidacy seriously by pressing him on the details of his policy pronouncements and helping the public understand the differences between the public and private sector. The sooner the media begins evaluating The Donald on the details of his policies and his governing expertise, rather than on his deliberately provocative comments designed to mobilize a disaffected public, the sooner The Donald鈥檚 political bubble is likely to burst. Alas, I have little confidence that most journalists, in this era of dwindling audiences and shrinking profit margins, will be able to resist taking the easy road by dismissing The Donald as a serious candidate.聽 To date, it is a media strategy that has The Donald laughing all the way to the top of polls.

Matthew Dickinson publishes his Presidential Power blog at聽.