Black voter turnout up, but Dems can't take 'Obama effect' for granted
If you had any doubts, it鈥檚 now official: President Obama has blacks to thank for his reelection. It turns out that record levels of black voter turnout propelled Obama to victory in 2012. So much so that if blacks had voted at 2004 levels, we鈥檇 all be saluting a President Romney right now.
We think Obama has a few million thank you cards to sign.
That鈥檚 according to on 2012 election data that contains a few gems that both parties would be wise to examine.
Among the surprises: Latinos aren鈥檛 as lucrative, votes-wise, as they appear to be 鈥� yet. And Democrats, who appeared to have cemented their role in 2012 as the minority party, shouldn鈥檛 get too comfortable.
Here are four lessons the 2012 election post-mortem taught us about the minority vote:
Black voters can turn out
听Voter ID laws. High unemployment among blacks. Low rates of registration. Lack of transportation and access to polling stations.
These were all last year, but they didn鈥檛.
Not only did black voters turn out, their turnout levels surpassed that of whites and most minority groups, including Latinos and Asians, in last year鈥檚 elections.
Though we don鈥檛 have exact data on the 2012 election turnout breakdown just yet, 2008 turnout data represented the smallest gap on record between whites (66.1 percent turnout) and blacks (65.2 percent turnout). According to the AP-Brookings analysis, 2 million to 5 million fewer whites voted in 2012 than in 2008, erasing that narrow lead.
Latinos still lag
The same headlines that warned of plummeting black voter turnout in 2012 also trumpeted the , which was supposed to see record levels of Latinos turn out at the polls.
They did, but not at the levels black voters turned out.
Consider this: While blacks make up about and 12 percent of the share of eligible voters, they represented 13 percent of the total 2012 votes cast, thereby 鈥渙utperforming鈥� their share.
By contrast, Latinos make up 17 percent of the population but just 11 percent of eligible voters and 10 percent of total 2012 votes cast, somewhat underperforming for their share.
In fact, Latinos probably won鈥檛 surpass the share of eligible black voters until 2024, according to the AP-Brookings analysis.
Why the lower Latino rates?
Latinos may be growing fast, but they鈥檙e still , with more than one-third of Latinos (almost 35 percent) younger than the voting age of 18.
What鈥檚 more, many Latinos are not yet US citizens and therefore ineligible to vote. Nearly two-thirds of legal Mexican immigrants are not US citizens, 鈥� and that鈥檚 not even counting illegal and undocumented immigrants.
But their day is coming
A proposed immigration bill in the Senate could see nearly 11 million immigrants currently here illegally become eligible for US citizenship 鈥� and voting 鈥� in as little as 13 years (the bill proposes a 13-year path to citizenship).
If that bill, or some iteration of it, passes, the total share of Latino voters may leap to 16 percent of the electorate by 2026. Under that same scenario, the share of eligible white voters could shrink to less than 64 percent, as the growing minority population edges out white population shares, according to the AP-Brookings report.
鈥淭he 2008 election was the first year when the minority vote was important to electing a U.S. president. By 2024, their vote will be essential to victory," William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution said . 鈥�Democrats will be looking at a landslide going into 2028 if the new Hispanic voters continue to favor Democrats.鈥�
But Democrats shouldn鈥檛 rest too easy
Whatever you heard about the GOP鈥檚 minority problem, the rainbow coalition is not a sure bet for Democrats in 2016 or for future elections.
In fact, 2012 may have been an exceptional year. That鈥檚 because Romney was an exceptionally poor candidate for motivating white voters, let alone minorities, to the polls. And Obama was an exceptionally strong candidate for motivating minorities. That鈥檚 a scenario Democrats may not be able to replicate again soon.
鈥淭he 2012 turnout 鈥� suggests 鈥� there is an 'Obama effect' where people were motivated to support Barack Obama,鈥� Andra Gillespie, a political science professor at Emory University, told the AP. 鈥淏ut it also means that black turnout may not always be higher, if future races aren't as salient.鈥�
Or, as GOP consultant Whit Ayres told the AP, 鈥淚t remains to be seen how successful Democrats are if you don't have Barack Obama at the top of the ticket.鈥�
What鈥檚 more, the GOP is well aware of its 鈥渕inority problem鈥� and working overtime to reverse it, starting with comprehensive immigration reform legislation that could make Latinos and Asians more receptive to the GOP in coming elections.
