海角大神

The Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump started off with a straitjacket of rules, particularly on communications. No cellphones, no talking allowed for senators in the chamber. For reporters, no 鈥渨alk and talk鈥� interviews with senators in the hallways. Instead, the media were to be confined to roped-off pens at the Senate exits.

But like water flowing downhill, it鈥檚 hard to stop lawmakers and media from finding each other, or senators from getting their message out.

鈥淎ny political figure that has something to say will find a way to say it. If they want the press to find them, they will be found,鈥� says Mo Elleithee, former communications director for the Democratic National Committee, and now at Georgetown University.

During an afternoon break on Wednesday, at least seven senators stopped to talk with reporters penned behind ropes and stanchions near a Senate exit. Democratic presidential hopeful Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota advised her Republican colleagues to 鈥渟tart acting like a juror鈥� and allow witnesses in the trial.聽Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas declared 鈥渘othing new鈥� after more than two hours of opening arguments.聽

The arguments were a 鈥渢our de force!鈥� responded Minority Leader Charles Schumer, waiting for Senator Cornyn to finish so he could have his say. The New Yorker made sure to repeat his message in front of television cameras and other media at a stakeout near the Senate basement.

Senators from both sides are talking informally with reporters in these locations and elsewhere, as well as holding press conferences and doing television interviews. Most notably, many are filing daily updates on Twitter, including sharing tips on how they are enduring hours on end of presentations.

Food and drink other than water (plain or fizzy) or milk (originally for health reasons) are forbidden in the chamber. Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat聽from Connecticut,聽 that 鈥渕ilk is the big news today,鈥� as his seatmate, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, went for the white stuff.聽He also shared an impeachment survival trick: 鈥淒uring the short breaks, unwrap a few hard candies and put them in your desk drawer. That way you avoid the noise of unwrapping them when you sneak one mid-trial.鈥�

Many Democrats have been sharing their views of the day鈥檚 events in brief, conversational videos that they post to Twitter, speaking directly to constituents.聽鈥淚t was a long, long day and night last night,鈥� Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama, the most endangered Democrat in the Senate, on Wednesday.

鈥淵esterday was bananas,鈥� said Sen. Kamala Harris of California, a Democratic presidential candidate, in . In a brief interview later, she explains that the videos are meant to 鈥渒eep people engaged, and to remind them that they are part of this process ... and what it鈥檚 really like.鈥�

The video strategy fits with today鈥檚 reality TV ethos, says Mr. Elleithee, where people want to see more than fixed cameras focused on the Senate chamber.聽Democrats want voters to be invested in the impeachment process, and they are hoping to speak to a broader electorate that includes independents.

Fewer Republicans have been doing speak-to-camera videos. But they鈥檙e still finding ways to get their messages out.聽

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida has been tweeting out a daily diary of sorts. 鈥淗ouse began presenting their case over course of 8 hours,鈥� Wednesday on Twitter. 鈥淥ffered detailed timeline of the events underpinning their case. We heard recorded testimony of witnesses, supplemented by transcripts & evidence gathered from press & social media. Will continue tomorrow.鈥�

These individual takes, of course, are only each lawmaker鈥檚 opinion. They aren鈥檛 reported pieces with comments from both sides and relevant context. They don鈥檛 give Americans the full picture of this historic trial, however partisan it may be.

Which is why journalists have objected so strenuously to the restrictions imposed on them by the Senate Republican leadership and the sergeant-at-arms.

Under normal circumstances, the Hill is the most accessible reporting spot on government in Washington. A hard congressional pass allows reporters to roam freely in the corridors of the Capitol and its office buildings. During the trial, senators can visit a pen 鈥� if they choose. But reporters aren鈥檛 able to find other viewpoints when they鈥檙e locked into a few square feet for 30 minutes or an hour during a break.

Lawmakers can jump over the media, but 鈥渨hat we say has more credibility, I would hope,鈥� says veteran New York Times reporter Carl Hulse. 鈥淲e鈥檙e serving a real purpose here, trying to sort out a pretty confusing mess that a lot of people don鈥檛 understand.鈥澛�

The restrictions have forced news organizations to adjust, taking more time to try to reach senators by phone and adding reporters to be in more places to try to catch them. That鈥檚 doable for a news giant like The New York Times, but it鈥檚 harder for smaller outlets.

Take the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. It has one reporter on the Hill, Daniel Moore. 鈥淭he restrictions make it really difficult,鈥� he says, preventing him from getting 鈥渁nything meaningful鈥� from either of the senators he covers from the swing state of Pennsylvania 鈥� Republican Pat Toomey and Democrat Bob Casey.

As of Day 3 of the trial, Mr. Moore had not been able to reach either senator during a break or on the phone. Normally, he鈥檚 got great access, he says, but in this case he has had to rely on the senators鈥� public comments.

Senator Toomey, who won his last race by a close margin, has offered up very little. When swarmed by reporters as he entered the Capitol鈥檚 internal subway, the senator commented only that the candy in the Senate cloakroom was running low.

Mr. Moore had better success on Thursday, speaking with Senator Casey on a phone press conference for Pennsylvania reporters, and gleaning some insight on Senator Toomey鈥檚 views from a television interview.

鈥淚 don鈥檛 want this to sound just like reporters whining,鈥� says Sarah Wire, who is chair of the Standing Committee of Correspondents on the Hill. 鈥淲e have a responsibility to the American people, to our readers and to viewers, and that鈥檚 my concern.鈥�

Still, since the trial started, things have loosened up a bit 鈥� both on the Senate floor and with journalists. Senators are no longer glued to their seats, but are disappearing for a moment (or quite a bit longer). They鈥檙e standing or stretching their legs at the back of the chamber. They can be seen munching on candy bars and chewing gum. Some even say they welcome being untethered from their cellphones.

Reporters are seeing fewer instances of Capitol police interrupting interviews mid-conversation, according to Ms. Wire, who writes for the Los Angeles Times. They鈥檙e also discovering other places to intercept senators.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 what we do for a living,鈥� she says. During the Clinton impeachment, reporters were not allowed on the same floor as the Senate chamber, which is how the underground stakeout by the subway cars got started, she explains. And indeed, during that five-week trial, restrictions on journalists eased.

鈥淭hat trial went on for a very long time,鈥� says Mr. Hulse. 鈥淚t鈥檚 very hard to sustain that level of red alert.鈥�

Staff writer Timmy Broderick contributed to this story.