As Kellyanne Conway's credibility wanes, what should TV news shows do?
Loading...
Kellyanne Conway presents a dilemma for news talk shows.
The counselor to President Trump has often acted as his translator for audiences, explaining the rationale behind his words and actions while also providing a boost to TV ratings and frequent viral moments. But her credibility also appears to be dissipating.
In the administration鈥檚 first 26 days, Ms. Conway has called falsehoods "alternative facts," cited a "Bowling Green massacre" that never happened, and said former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn had the "full confidence" of the president, only to be contradicted an hour later by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer.
Now, the anchors of MSNBC鈥檚 鈥淢orning Joe鈥 say they 鈥,鈥 with other shows' hosts telling Politico .
The debate within news organizations on whether to give Conway a stage highlights important questions about the media's role in discerning and disseminating truth, and some say, the morality of propaganda - or "alternative facts" - in a democracy.聽
Some pundits argue the Conway controversy is simply evidence of a disorganized White House with too many messengers and without a clear message 鈥 a problem faced by previous presidencies, including Bill Clinton's.聽
Others suggest that it's a deliberate choice by a president who likes baiting the news media. Conway, in particular, is considered a master debater and performer. She has delivered straight-faced defenses of Mr. Trump鈥檚 most outlandish statements and artfully dodged interviewers鈥 questions. Trump has praised some of her most controversial interviews, she has said.
The question, then, is what should the media do. Some observers and critics say audiences know politicians and their surrogates bend the truth. It鈥檚 the media鈥檚 responsibility, they say, to invite guests like Conway on, challenge them, and fact-check them in real time. Others urge talk shows to follow the example of 鈥淢orning Joe.鈥 A guest鈥檚 purpose, they say, is to inform audiences, not confuse them.聽
鈥淭he nature of the exchange between a news person and a guest on a show should be to inform the electorate of what is and is not knowable. If you have a guest that is unreliable and making statements that are false, you鈥檙e not helping your audience with what is needed in the moment,鈥 says Kathleen Hall Jamieson, a communications professor and director of the University of Pennsylvania鈥檚 Annenberg Public Policy Center. 鈥淚t may be entertaining, but it鈥檚 not helpful to audiences, and it鈥檚 not a productive use of a news outlet鈥檚 time.鈥澛
Ever since Conway became a prominent voice within the Trump campaign, she has infuriated some reporters by dodging and derailing interviewers鈥 questions. But her ability to serve as a mouthpiece for the administration reached a new low on Monday, when she told MSNBC that Mr. Flynn had the 鈥full confidence鈥 of the president only an hour before Mr. Spicer said the White House was 鈥渆valuating the situation.鈥 Later that evening, Flynn resigned.
It鈥檚 unclear whether Conway鈥檚 remark resulted from her own misinformation or a deliberate attempt to mislead the media. Administration officials also noted that Trump didn't fire Flynn, he resigned.聽
In any case, 鈥淢orning Joe鈥 co-anchors Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough said on Tuesday that they will no longer invite Conway for interviews.
鈥淚t鈥檚 giving people dishonesty. It鈥檚 not worth the interview,鈥 said Ms. Brzezinski. 鈥淪he goes out and lies, and you find out about those lies a couple hours later,鈥 added Mr. Scarborough.
MSNBC says it has no blanket policy about a talk show guest鈥檚 credibility, giving anchors and producers flexibility to make editorial decisions. Spokespeople for NBC News, CBS News, ABC News, and CNN did not reply to questions from 海角大神 about how they plan to respond to questions about Conway鈥檚 credibility or future appearances.
But CNN has declined to have Conway on the air before. After Conway cited a terrorist attack in Bowling Green, Ky., that never happened, CNN declined to have her on as a guest on its Sunday morning talk shows two weeks ago. The decision, in part, was because the Trump administration offered her instead of Vice President Mike Pence. But it also was the result of what the network told the New York Times鈥檚 Jim Rutenberg were 鈥溾
But CNN walked back its decision a few days later, with Conway appearing on 鈥淭he Lead with Jake Tapper." In a , Conway criticized the media for sloppy reporting, but said it was unfair to label CNN as 鈥渇ake news.鈥 She also apologized for criticizing the media for not covering the non-existent "Bowling Green Massacre." Mr. Tapper鈥檚 performance was 聽by those wanting a more aggressive approach to fact-checking the Trump team.
An interview by the 鈥淭oday Show鈥檚鈥 Matt Lauer on Tuesday earned the anchor similar praise on social media as his interview .
In some ways, Conway represents Trump鈥檚 war with the media, writes Michael Wolff in a January profile of Conway for The Hollywood Reporter.
鈥淚f he is to continue his war 鈥撀燢ellyanne Conway will be both ,鈥 writes Mr. Wolff. 鈥淗ers is an artful technique and a consummate piece of showmanship, of staying out of the corner of either/or (with anchor after anchor demanding of her, "This isn't true, is it?"), of recasting any attack as ad hominem, of shifting the question to what she can easily defend and of making the media reality seem petty and gotcha,鈥 he adds. 聽
Seth Gannon, a former champion debater and coach at Speech Labs, told Vox that Conway 鈥渒ey terms and concepts, preys on interviewers鈥 politeness, and displays an almost 鈥榩ostmodern鈥 ability to recreate reality in order to trip up her interviewer and paint Trump in the best possible light.鈥
But many media observers agree with calls to keep Conway off the air because, they say, her waning credibility is not only confusing, but distracting.
鈥淕iven the dangerous times we live in, the significance and magnitude of the issues we must confront, the polarization of this nation across all categories 鈥 gender, age, income, and certainly race 鈥撀營 think this kind of punch, counter-punch communication strategy is not very helpful,鈥 says Robert Denton, chair of the communications department at Virginia Tech University. 鈥淲hen you go from candidate to governing, when the eyes of the world are watching you, [Trump] needs to be more sensitive to his audience.鈥
Dr. Denton and others point to the White House鈥檚 need for a clear communication strategy. A presidential administration that effectively communicates to the electorate has one speaker and one message, they say. The Trump administration has Conway, Spicer, and Stephen Miller all speaking on behalf of the president.
Other presidencies have made this mistake before, says Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston. When Bill Clinton first took office, his administration lacked a communication director, instead relying on officials like George Stephanopoulos and Dee Dee Myers.
鈥淚 thought that part of the problem with the White House was there were too many people responsible for talking to the press,鈥 Ms. Myers told PBS鈥檚 鈥淔rontline" in 2000. 鈥淚t wasn't that there weren't enough, there were too many.鈥
But perhaps it's a deliberate choice by the new president. Trump鈥檚 management style is to bring competing power centers together聽as a way to surface new and creative ideas, people who have studied his business practices told the Monitor鈥檚 Linda Feldmann.
Conway also told Mr. Wolff that Trump鈥檚 two favorite series of interviews were her 鈥渁lternative facts鈥 interview with Chuck Todd and subsequent talk shows and her head-to-head with CNN鈥檚 Anderson Cooper on the much-disputed Russian dossier.
The Trump administration's media tactics emphasize subjectivity, not truth, in a strategy of the tobacco and fossil fuel industry鈥檚 promotion of alternative facts 鈥 as well as a Russian media strategy, writes Steven Waldman for the Washington Monthly.
鈥淏y generating fictional articles, they created confusion about what stories were true and what sources were reliable,鈥 writes Mr. Waldman. 鈥淎 former Ambassador to Russia, Michael A. McFaul, explained, 鈥楾hey don鈥檛 try to win the argument. It鈥檚 to聽make everything seem relative.鈥欌
And some argue American audiences understand this relativity. In other words, writes syndicated conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg, viewers know politicians .
鈥淭he Fourth Estate priesthood thinks viewers can鈥檛 see through Conway鈥檚 spin, so they must be protected from it. It鈥檚 a compliment to Conway and her skills, and an admission of incompetence by the press,鈥 writes Mr. Goldberg. 鈥淗ere鈥檚 a news flash for the news industry: Birds are gonna fly, fish are gonna swim, and politicians are gonna lie.鈥