Elena Kagan follows Supreme Court nominee rulebook: be bland
| Washington
Ever since Judge Robert Bork鈥檚 unsuccessful nomination to the Supreme Court stumbled out of the gate in 1987, high court nominees 鈥� and their backers 鈥� have consciously sought to avoid the same fate.
That means an attention to detail from the moment the nomination is announced. Judge Bork was skewered by Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) of Massachusetts on the floor of the Senate less than an hour after President Reagan had unveiled the nomination. Bork never recovered.
Elena Kagan has passed her first few days as President Obama鈥檚 latest court nominee according to script 鈥� that is, without saying anything remotely or potentially controversial. Ms. Kagan held her first courtesy calls with senators Monday, a part of the pre-confirmation-hearings ritual. In public comments before their meeting, Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D) of Nevada pledged to do what he could to ensure a smooth transition.
IN PICTURES: Notable women in US politics and Supreme Court Justices with no prior judicial experience
In remarks on the Senate floor before meeting with Kagan, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky warned that 碍补驳补苍鈥檚 position as a member of the administration (solicitor general) and friendship with Obama must not hinder her judgment if she joins the court.
鈥淚t鈥檚 my hope that the Obama administration doesn鈥檛 think the ideal Supreme Court nominee is someone who would rubber stamp its policies,鈥� Senator McConnell said. 鈥淏ut this nomination does raise the question. And it鈥檚 a question that needs to be answered. Americans want to know that Ms. Kagan will be independent, that she won鈥檛 prejudge cases based on her personal opinions, that she鈥檒l treat everyone equally, as the judicial oath requires.鈥�
After 碍补驳补苍鈥檚 meetings with senators, public statements were predictably bland. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he appreciated the opportunity to meet with her and 鈥渨ill thoroughly examine her record to determine whether she would fairly and impartially use the Constitution, not her personal views, to guide her decisions.鈥�
碍补驳补苍鈥檚 backers have wasted no time advocating on her behalf. On Monday, the day of her nomination, a group called the Coalition for Constitutional 海角大神 was already up with a biographical . The White House produced , which Obama鈥檚 political wing at the Democratic National Committee is encouraging supporters to share with friends via e-mail.
Kagan skeptics have floated a number of objections to her nomination, but nothing has caught fire in a way that looks potentially fatal to confirmation:
- 碍补驳补苍鈥檚 is one common argument, though through history, many justices 鈥� some among the most illustrious 鈥� also had never served as judges before joining the high court.
- Her East Coast Ivy League inside-the-Beltway life story, with a detour at the University of Chicago (which some would call more of same), has led critics to suggest she has little 鈥渞eal world鈥� experience.
- Her scant paper trail leaves some liberals worrying she鈥檚 a stealth candidate who cannot be fully counted upon on key court holdings, such as the right of privacy found in the Roe v. Wade abortion decision.
- Her hiring record as dean of Harvard Law School, in which she hired no black law professors during her six-year tenure, has been cause for concern among some black activists.
- Her controversial stand on US will surely be scrutinized at the hearings.
But perhaps just as important to how Senate Republicans will vote when confirmation hearings start is the political season. November midterms are fast approaching, and some senators are apprehensive. Even Senator Hatch, who is not up for reelection until 2012, has to be looking over his shoulder, following the defeat of fellow Utah Sen. Bob Bennett at the state GOP鈥檚 nominating convention last Saturday.
鈥淧olitics probably complicates things,鈥� says John Maltese, a political scientist at the University of Georgia, Athens, and expert on federal court confirmations. 鈥淚 think senators will be concerned about reelection and threats of retaliation for how they vote, either way.鈥�
IN PICTURES: Notable women in US politics and Supreme Court Justices with no prior judicial experience
Related:
