海角大神

Pentagon budget: top 3 winners and losers

As the Pentagon rolled out its budget preview Thursday, it stressed the tough work involved in cutting $487 billion over the next decade. But in Pentagon parlance, the word 鈥渃ut鈥 is a relative term. While the Defense Department鈥檚 base budget initially decreases from $553 billion this year to $525 billion in fiscal year 2013, it is still more than its $480 billion base budget in 2008, when US troops were in the midst of two wars. The budget will then rebound steadily to $567 billion in fiscal year 2017. 

With this in mind, here are the top three winners and losers:

Winner No. 1: the Navy

US Navy/AP/File
Some budget hawks wanted the Pentagon to ditch one of its 11 aircraft carriers. No thank you, the Pentagon said.

The Pentagon has made no secret of its plan to shift its attention toward the Pacific (read China) in the years to come. This is a boon for the US Navy, whose aircraft carriers and submarines will be key in any US military maneuvering that involves China, senior military officials stress. It is a change of fortune for a service branch that often felt marginalized amid the decade鈥檚 two large counterinsurgency wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Indeed, despite some robust calls to reduce just one of the 11 aircraft carriers in the Navy鈥檚 fleet, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced Thursday that this would not be happening. He cited the need for a Navy 鈥渢hat maintains forward presence and is able to penetrate enemy defenses.鈥

What鈥檚 more, the Pentagon will be putting money into developing, for example, 鈥渁 new afloat forward staging base鈥 and 鈥渁 design that will allow new Virginia-class submarines to be modified to carry more cruise missiles.鈥

The Pentagon is also currently working to develop an 鈥渦ndersea conventional prompt global strike option鈥 鈥 essentially arming submarine-based missiles with conventional warheads 鈥 despite a Bush administration decision to scrap it amid concerns that they would be mistaken for nuclear missile strikes.

鈥淢odernizing our submarine fleet will be critical to our efforts to maintain maritime access in these vital regions of the world,鈥 Mr. Panetta said. One senior military official pointed to the Navy鈥檚 鈥減articularly useful role鈥 in the seas around China, 鈥渇or the things we want to do in the future.鈥

1 of 6
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.