海角大神

Can the US military help Libyan rebels oust Muammar Qaddafi? Four options.

As violence in Libya increases, US officials have promised that the administration is exploring 鈥渁ll possible options for action鈥 against Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi. Yet Pentagon officials emphasize that they are also weighing the adverse risks of US military action aiding rebels, such as the possibility that Mr. Qaddafi could galvanize support in the name of anti-imperialism.

What are steps the US military could take to aid rebels, and how feasible are they?

1. Create a no-fly zone

Darrin Zammit Lupi/Reuters
A Libyan Air Force pilot walks next to his Mirage F1 fighter jet after landing at Malta International Airport outside Valletta Feb. 21.

One of the more frequently mentioned scenarios is to establish a 鈥渘o fly鈥 zone over Libya 鈥 an option that the White House says is under consideration. The idea would be to prevent Qaddafi from using aircraft to attack rebels or civilians.

But establishing a no-fly zone would be 鈥渃hallenging,鈥 Gen. James Mattis, head of US Central Command, told Congress Tuesday. US forces would first 鈥渉ave to remove鈥 Libyan air-defense capabilities, including difficult-to-detect antiaircraft missiles.

Also on Tuesday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen called such a no-fly operation 鈥渆xtraordinarily complex鈥. We鈥檇 have to work our way through doing it in a safe manner鈥 in order to 鈥渘ot put ourselves in jeopardy.鈥

While the Libyan Air Force 鈥渋s not exactly the Luftwaffe鈥 鈥 a reference to the formidable German air force of World War II 鈥 it does have air defenses, says Tom Donnelly, director of the Center for Defense Studies at the American Enterprise Institute.

But there are options short of an air war. US or NATO aircraft could conceivably 鈥渘eutralize fixed wing [airplanes] relatively simply with a couple of well-placed craters on a runway,鈥 says retired Col. Dwight Raymond of the Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pa. 鈥淵ou could put in those craters and not hurt anybody in the process,鈥 he adds.

But Libyan helicopters, which could be used to shoot at civilian protesters, are more difficult to detect by aircraft patrolling no-fly zones, says Mr. Raymond.

Equally tricky are the diplomatic considerations surrounding the establishment of a no-fly zone. The Pentagon has already said that if a no-fly zone were to be established, it 鈥渨ould be more than just the US鈥 enforcing it. Italy has said that it would allow the use of its bases, but only under the auspices of a United Nations resolution. Yet the chances of Russia and China supporting such a resolution are uncertain, says Richard Fontaine, an analyst with the Center for a New American Security.

Also unclear is whether Russia could 鈥済et comfortable鈥 with the idea that NATO would likely lead such an endeavor. The United Kingdom has already pointed out that its bases in Cyprus could be used to help enforce a no-fly zone.

The point would be to try to contain Qaddafi鈥檚 forces and options. 鈥淵ou鈥檙e not so much trying to destroy perpetrators as you are to try to influence their decisionmaking process鈥 and encourage them not to harm their people, says Raymond.

US forces are likely to debrief two Libyan fighter pilots who recently defected to Malta with their jets. 鈥淭hose two would be fantastic sources of intelligence, especially if we鈥檙e trying to establish a no-fly zone,鈥 says Raymond, who adds that they would also be able to provide information on the morale within the Libyan military.

1 of 4
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.