UK general election: Could it end 'special relationship' with US?
| Washington
Ever since Winston Churchill spoke of a 鈥渟pecial relationship鈥� between the US and the United Kingdom more than 60 years ago, the phrase has been used to describe relations between two countries that have stuck by each other鈥檚 side right through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But is the special relationship now dead?
The results of the UK general election Thursday are likely to be a determining factor.
If the Conservative leader David Cameron pulls off a win, look for a concerted effort at least from the eastern side of the Atlantic to revitalize a relationship that by all accounts sat stuck in the deep freeze under President Obama and Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg looks to Europe
But if the Liberal Democrats led by the surprisingly strong Nick Clegg somehow come out on top, the phrase 鈥渟pecial relationship鈥� is likely to be retired to the history books, alongside the unequaled ties forged in the war years of Churchill and President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Mr. Clegg has made it clear that he sees Britain鈥檚 future with Europe more than with the US.
Few observers give Mr. Brown, languishing in third place in polls, much of a chance to be around to form a new government and try to melt the ice between Washington and London.
鈥淭he UK elections will have a significant impact on the special relationship,鈥� says Nile Gardiner, an expert in US-Europe issues at the Heritage Foundation in Washington. 鈥淚f Cameron becomes prime minister, repairing the frayed state of the Anglo-American relationship will be a top priority.鈥�
But will the Obama administration be interested?
Much has been said about the 鈥渂ad blood鈥� between Messers. Obama and Brown, about the rebuffed requests from Downing Street for one-on-one sit-downs between the two leaders at multilateral gatherings. In March the House of Commons鈥� Foreign Affairs Committee, dominated by Brown鈥檚 labor Party, was so incensed that it voted to end the use of 鈥渟pecial relationship鈥� to describe the US-UK ties.
But Obama hasn鈥檛 been especially close to any European leaders, experts note, so they question whether even an effort by a pro-US Cameron to warm things up would make a difference.
Mr. Gardiner thinks so. 鈥淚t鈥檚 true that Obama has been especially bad at treating key allies, and the results with Britain are no exception,鈥� he says. But he adds that issues like NATO support in Afghanistan could make for a different White House response to a pro-American British prime minister.
Obama's coolness towards Europe
Others say any British leader will have trouble overcoming what seems to be Obama鈥檚 coolness towards Europe鈥檚 leaders in general.
鈥淭he main problem facing a British leader in dealings with the White House is that Obama is the first president since World War II who is not an Atlanticist,鈥� says Reginald Dale, a senior fellow with the Europe Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
The White House is keen to see Britain remain a strong military partner in a Europe of falling defense budgets, Mr. Dale says, and he offers as a plus that a Prime Minster Cameron 鈥渨ould at least start with a clean sheet.鈥� But he sees little likelihood of a warm relationship between the two leaders, given what he calls Obama鈥檚 鈥渞ecord of disdain鈥� for European leaders.
And Cameron, despite his pro-American stance, would be unlikely to grovel in a quest to keep the 鈥渟pecial relationship鈥� alive. He certainly will not have forgotten, transatlantic experts say, that former Prime Minister Tony Blair was labeled a 鈥減oodle鈥� and a 鈥渓ap dog鈥� in the British press over his close ties to former President George W. Bush.
Related:
If British election 2010 results trump popular vote, what next?
President Obama may be slumping at home, but he's surging in Europe
