海角大神

Federal court strikes down Wisconsin abortion law as unconstitutional

A panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago in a 2-1 ruling concluded Monday the medical benefit to the requirement was 'nonexistent' and 'cannot be taken seriously as a measure to improve women鈥檚 health.'

|
Rick Wilking/Reuters
A closed Planned Parenthood facility is seen in Westminster, Colorado, September 9, 2015.

A US appeals court has ruled that聽a Wisconsin law聽requiring that聽abortion聽providers have admitting privileges at a local hospital, is unconstitutional.

The law in question requires聽doctors who provide abortions to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of where they carry out the procedure.

Abortion providers, Planned Parenthood and Affiliated Medical Services (AMS), sued the state arguing that the law effectively restricted access to abortions in Wisconsin.

A panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago in a 2-1 ruling concluded Monday the medical benefit to the requirement was 鈥渘onexistent鈥 and 鈥渃annot be taken seriously as a measure to improve women鈥檚 health.鈥

Supporters of the law argued that requiring doctors performing procedures to have local admitting privileges would ensure that patients receive continuous care should complications arise that warrant hospitalization.

The plaintiffs said that the new law would effectively shutter AMS's clinic in Milwaukee. Planned Parenthood clinics picking up the additional caseload would likely see increases in wait times, making it more difficult to women to schedule procedures, according to the lawsuit.

In March 2015, US聽District Judge William Conley had said that the law served no legitimate health interest. The Wisconsin Department of Justice subsequently appealed to the 7th聽Circuit.

鈥淲hat makes no sense is to abridge the constitutional right to an abortion on the basis of spurious contentions regarding women鈥檚 health 鈥 and the abridgment challenged in this case would actually endanger women鈥檚 health,鈥 Judge Richard Posner wrote for the majority.

Dissenting was Judge Daniel Manion, who said admitting privileges requirement helps protects women's health and doesn't amount to an undue constitutional burden.聽

"The solution to the plaintiffs' problems is that they find more qualified doctors, not that the state relax 鈥 or that we strike down as unconstitutional 鈥 precautions taken by the state to protect the health and safety of pregnant women who have chosen to end their pregnancies," Judge Manion wrote.

Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin issued a statement praising the 7th Circuit decision. The group's CEO, Teri Huyck, said the law was intended "to put obstacles in the path of women seeking safe, legal abortion care in Wisconsin."

According to the Guttmacher Institute, which supports legal access to abortion, on abortion providers. 聽Of those 11 states, courts have temporarily blocked the requirements in six states.聽

The US Supreme Court, is set to hear a similar case in Texas, an oral argument will likely be heard early next year with a decision issued by late June.聽

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
海角大神 was founded in 1908 to lift the standard of journalism and uplift humanity. We aim to 鈥渟peak the truth in love.鈥 Our goal is not to tell you what to think, but to give you the essential knowledge and understanding to come to your own intelligent conclusions. Join us in this mission by subscribing.
QR Code to Federal court strikes down Wisconsin abortion law as unconstitutional
Read this article in
/USA/2015/1124/Federal-court-strikes-down-Wisconsin-abortion-law-as-unconstitutional
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe