US closes no-fly loophole exposed by Faisal Shahzad
Loading...
| New York
It鈥檚 now going to be harder for terror suspects to get on an airplane. At least in theory.
Airlines will be required, the Obama administration announced Wednesday, to manually recheck their passenger lists within two hours of being notified of a 鈥渟pecial circumstances expedited No Fly name.鈥
An example of such an individual: Faisal Shahzad, who is now under arrest and is accused of trying to blow up a sport utility vehicle in Times Square on Saturday evening.
Mr. Shahzad was placed on the no-fly list on noon Monday, but he still managed to board an Emirates flight to Dubai on Monday night. He was arrested before the flight took off.
Up until Wednesday, airlines had a 24-hour window before a flight to check to see if travelers had been placed on the no-fly list.
Shahzad showed up at the airport without a reservation and paid cash for a ticket to leave the United States immediately.
In Shahzad鈥檚 case, 鈥渢he airline seemingly didn鈥檛 check the name, and the suspect was allowed to purchase a ticket and obtain a boarding pass,鈥 says an administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
In the coming months, the process will change more because it will not be the airlines that will be checking the no-fly list. Three years ago, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) began preparing to take over this responsibility from the airlines. The program is called Secure Flight.
According to the administration official, TSA will prescreen passenger information against the list for all domestic flights within the next two months. It will prescreen international passengers by the end of 2010.
Under Secure Flight, TSA processes information beginning up to 72 hours in advance of a flight and then vets the passenger list until the flight departs.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, some 3,400 names, including about 170 Americans, are on the no-fly list.
The no-fly list has been somewhat controversial in the past. Once an individual鈥檚 name got on the list, perhaps inadvertently, he or she found it difficult to get off the list. Civil libertarians complained about 鈥渇alse positives鈥 and harassment.
Last year, after the attempted Christmas Day bombing over Detroit, the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement, 鈥淟aw enforcement routinely run names against the watchlists for matters as mundane as traffic stops, and innocent individuals may be harassed even if they don鈥檛 attempt to fly.鈥
Around the same time, Janet Napolitano, secretary of Homeland Security, said on CNN鈥檚 show 鈥淪tate of the Union,鈥 鈥淵ou have to understand that you need information that is specific and credible if you鈥檙e going to actually bar someone from air travel.鈥
On Wednesday, David Stempler, president of the Air Travelers Association, said he thought the two-hour rule is a good idea. 鈥淚t was sorely needed,鈥 he said in an interview. 鈥淭hey need to make the security even tighter to make sure it does not happen again. It might inconvenience some people, but it鈥檚 a necessity for security.鈥
The industry will comply with the new rules, says Victoria Day, a spokeswoman for the Air Transport Association.
Related: