Europe votes in net neutrality, but doesn鈥檛 ban Internet 'fast lanes'
The European Parliament voted on Tuesday to approve "net neutrality" regulations, but rejected amendments that would have clarified the rules, leaving the European Union with a set of regulations that critics say are too vague.
Spanish Parliament member Pilar del Castillo, who originally proposed the text, said the new rules will guarantee an open Internet and that they would prevent Internet providers from offering companies better access to users in exchange for compensation. However, the adopted rules allow providers to prioritize the delivery of certain services, and to exempt content from monthly data caps, which critics say could lead to an Internet 鈥渇ast lane鈥� and 鈥渟low lane.鈥�
One of the rejected amendments would have specified the circumstances under which Internet providers may prioritize specialized services, such as medical operations and self-driving car data, over other Internet traffic. Proponents of the bill argued that it makes sense to give priority to such services, but critics such as World Wide Web founder Sir Tim Berners-Lee that the rules are written in such a way that companies with deep pockets could pay to have their content classified as a 鈥渟pecialized service,鈥� and therefore delivered faster than competitors鈥� content.
Another of the rejected amendments would have addressed 鈥渮ero-rating鈥� products, which are apps and services that don鈥檛 count against monthly data limits. An consortium of tech companies including Netflix and Reddit the practice, saying it 鈥渃reates the same harms to innovation and competition as fast lanes as it is typically provided for payment.鈥�
Critics say zero-rating allows Internet providers to play favorites by striking deals with some companies to exempt their services from data limits, therefore making them more attractive to consumers. Proponents of the regulations, however, say there鈥檚 still time for specific rules on zero-rating to take shape.
"[By]聽September next year we will have the guidelines and the real enforcement work begins," Chris Marsden, a law professor at the University of Sussex, the BBC.
The approved regulations, together known as the 鈥淓uropean Single Market for Electronic Communications,鈥� are similar in many ways to the Open Internet rules implemented in the US earlier this year. Both ban Internet providers from slowing or blocking content, and from accepting payment from companies to prioritize their traffic.
But while the American rules also have exceptions for zero-rating and specialized services, the Federal Communications Commission has the authority to if those exceptions are being used to evade the spirit of the Open Internet rules or to create a de facto 鈥渇ast lane.鈥� The European rules how regulators should act if the exceptions are used to harm competition.
The EU regulations take a hard stance against cellular roaming charges. Starting in June 2017, cellular companies won鈥檛 be able to charge customers extra for using data or making calls outside their home countries but still within the EU. The only exception is a penalty for 鈥減ermanent roaming,鈥� when a customer uses a SIM card from a country with cheap cell service while living in another country with more expensive service.
