海角大神

Streaming music service Grooveshark goes dark

The Grooveshark website paid no royalties to artists or record companies and has been in legal trouble since 2009.

|
Grooveshark
Steaming music service Grooveshark shut down on Thursday to settle a longstanding series of lawsuits against it. Here, the Grooveshark homepage in 2014 shows an ad for the service's "VIP" streaming tier.

Grooveshark has been around longer than Spotify, Rdio, Beats Music, or Google Play. At its peak, it had more than 35 million users and a virtually infinite library of music. Yet Grooveshark, which allowed users to upload music to the site for others to stream, didn't seek licenses from the recordings' copyright holders. Instead, they argued that they should not be held liable if site users upload copyrighted works, which they did in great quantities.

This approach didn鈥檛 sit well with the three major American record companies, which began litigating against Grooveshark in 2009. On Thursday, Grooveshark agreed to shut down its web and mobile sites and to hand over all its patents and copyrights in order to settle the lawsuits against it. A note posted on read in part, 鈥淲e failed to secure licenses from rights holders for the vast amount of music on the service. That was wrong. We apologize. Without reservation.鈥

Last year, a federal judge found that Grooveshark was at fault by allowing music to be streamed on its service without compensating artists or record labels. In addition, the judge found that Grooveshark employees had uploaded thousands of copyrighted songs to the service, so the company couldn鈥檛 claim protection against the actions of its users. Earlier this month, the judge ruled that Escape Media Group, the company that owned Grooveshark, could be liable for more than $700 million in statutory copyright damages because the copyright infringement was willful.

Instead, Grooveshark鈥檚 founders, Sam Tarantino and Josh Greenberg, worked out a settlement in which they shut down the Grooveshark service entirely, deleted all copyrighted songs, and handed over all their intellectual property to the record companies. Mr. Tarantino and Mr. Greenberg acknowledged that their service had infringed copyright, and Escape Media Group agreed to 鈥渟ignificant financial penalties鈥 if the settlement terms were not followed, The New York Times.

The settlement also means that Broadcasts, Grooveshark鈥檚 attempt at a legal streaming service, is no more. Broadcasts was an app for iOS and Android that gave users access to curated playlists for 99 cents per month. Broadcasts used standard royalty rates to reimburse artists and record labels for songs streamed, so Grooveshark didn鈥檛 need to negotiate directly with Universal, Sony, and Warner to secure rights.

At the time Grooveshark was founded, no similar streaming service existed. Spotify didn鈥檛 come to the US until 2011, and other services such as Pandora selected songs for users, rather than allowing them to choose what to listen to from an online library.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
海角大神 was founded in 1908 to lift the standard of journalism and uplift humanity. We aim to 鈥渟peak the truth in love.鈥 Our goal is not to tell you what to think, but to give you the essential knowledge and understanding to come to your own intelligent conclusions. Join us in this mission by subscribing.
QR Code to Streaming music service Grooveshark goes dark
Read this article in
/Technology/2015/0501/Streaming-music-service-Grooveshark-goes-dark
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe