海角大神

When did people first arrive in South America?

A team of scientists find evidence of human occupation in Chile thousands of years earlier than previously thought.

|
Courtesy of Tom Dillehay
A very small faceted basalt wedge. Basalt is a local material. This tool, also found at MVI, was made 15,000-16,000 years ago. It would have been used for woodworking.
|
Courtesy of Tom Dillehay
A pebble tool with a bifacially knapped and retouched edge. The stone, called serpentine, is not a local material but likely comes from the coastal cordillera west of Monte Verde. It was found at the older site, MVI, and was made 17,000-19,000 years ago.
|
Courtesy of Tom Dillehay
Terrain similar to what Monte Verde might have looked like during the late Pleistocene era. The ground is crisscrossed by shallow drainage features, while higher ground has patchy vegetation.

The earliest known Americans might have been living deep in South America significantly earlier than scientists thought.

Researchers had previously found clues indicating that people were living at the Monte Verde site in southern Chile as early as 15,000 years ago. But new evidence pushes that timeline even further back.

Stone tools, ancient fire pits, charred animal bones, and edible plant remains found during a new investigation into the site were dated between .

Archeologist Tom Dillehay is no stranger to the Monte Verde site, nor is he a stranger to pushing the date of early human occupation in the Americas ever earlier.听

Dr. Dillehay began research at the Chile site in 1977. At the time, scientists thought that the first Americans were what they call the Clovis people,聽large-game hunters who lived in North America beginning some 13,000 years ago. When Dillehay found evidence that people lived in Monte Verde some 14,500 years ago, a long debate ensued.

Now, Dillehay鈥檚 research team is pushing that date back thousands of years earlier yet again.

Initially Dillehay didn鈥檛 want to return to Monte Verde after finally debunking the "Clovis-first" model, 鈥渨hich is dead now,鈥 he tells 海角大神 in an interview.

But his team of archaeologists, geologists and botanists returned to Chile in 2013 when the country鈥檚 National Council of Monuments asked them for more investigation of the site.

鈥淲e went back, thinking we weren鈥檛 going to find anything,鈥 Dillehay says. 鈥淚t didn鈥檛 turn out that way.鈥

鈥淲e opened up the excavations even more, and we just kept finding things,鈥 he says.听

Although archaeologist Jon Erlandson of the University of Oregon, who is not involved in the study, that, if correct, the new findings will 鈥渟hake up both the archaeology and genomics of the peopling of the Americas,鈥 some other archeologists aren鈥檛 sure the new findings are that groundbreaking.

鈥淭hey鈥檙e earlier dates certainly, but for an outsider in these debates,鈥 McMaster University archaeologist Andrew Roddick, who focuses on later archeological finds and cultures in South America, tells the Monitor, 鈥淚 wouldn鈥檛 say that this will radically change my understanding.鈥

鈥淭his research may not be a thunderbolt out of the blue,鈥 University of Central Florida archeologist John Walker, who is not connected to the study, tells the Monitor. 鈥淏ut it still is vindication of the idea that people living in South America had complex, interesting ways of life.鈥

The new findings not only represent a much earlier population of ancient Americans in Chile, but they also reveal that the community was likely much more sophisticated and mobile than previously assumed. The new findings are summarized in a new paper published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE.

鈥淲e don鈥檛 have a written record for this first chapter of humanity and the only way we鈥檙e going to get at it is to do this sort of interdisciplinary archeological work,鈥 says Dillehay.

Early life in Monte Verde

Although glaciers had already begun to retreat in the area as the last Ice Age ended, the Monte Verde site was likely still quite cold and tundra-like at the time, explains Dillehay. In that environment, it would have been difficult to eke out a living.

鈥淚 think they were probably highly mobile,鈥 Dillehay says of these early Americans. He describes the archaeologic record from 14,500 to 18,500 years ago as ephemeral. If there had been a population settled in the region long-term, there would have been a much more distinct archeological record, he says, with a more continuous and intense 鈥渇low of artifactual debris.鈥澛

So Dillehay thinks these people were at Monte Verde during the summer, passing through on a search for food or perhaps for other human groups.

These nomadic hunter-gatherers likely feasted on large animals, like mastodons or prehistoric llamas, and smaller game, like deer. The ancient animals鈥 bones were discovered in and around fire pits, broken and burned, suggesting the meat had been roasted.听

Remains of edible plants were also found at the site, dating to the same time period. Burned stems suggest these people were cooking these plants too.

A number of stone tools were also recovered from the ancient site. Many of these stones were simple "unifacial" tools, with just one face of the stone worked to create a sharp edge. But some of the stones dated more recently show bifacial work.

A moving population聽

Intriguingly, some 34 percent of these tools were made from exotic materials, like limestone and white quartz, not originating in Monte Verde. Most of the rocks appear to come from the coast and some from the Andes mountains or beyond, says Dillehay.听

Also, the coastal rocks, 鈥渢hey鈥檙e beach pebbles,鈥 says Dillehay. 鈥淭here鈥檚 no doubt about it.鈥 He explains that the flat shape of the stones are distinctive to beaches.听

Perhaps that鈥檚 where the people in Monte Verde were during the winters.听

But they could have also gone further into the mountains at times. By about 19,000 years ago, says Dillehay, mountain passes were open and these people could have been traveling through the Andes.

Some of the food remains spotted at the Monte Verde site also originated outside of the region. Some of the plants didn鈥檛 grow in the area at the time, and the game likely wouldn鈥檛 have been found there either.听

Although the area would have been getting more vegetated with the animals鈥 foods throughout deglaciation, it might not have been that way the whole time. These people might have had to hunt the game elsewhere.

鈥淲hy were they mobile? Some of it may have had to do with seeking food resources,鈥 says Dillehay. But, he adds, 鈥淚 always tend to think these people were a lot more social than we give them credit for.鈥 Perhaps their movement was about creating social networks or exchanging technical and environmental knowledge, Dillehay says.

Dillehay鈥檚 previous work revealed a much more well-established group of people at the Monte Verde site after 14,500 years ago. These people had huts, used medicinal plants, and were more settled than their earlier counterparts.听

With much less scattered artifacts, the population likely settled down for a longer stay at the site come some 14,500 years ago.

How did these people get to Monte Verde so long ago?

It鈥檚 often thought that humans migrated to the Americas by walking over the Bering land bridge that appeared during the last Ice Age. When the glaciers sucked up much of the world鈥檚 water, ocean levels sunk, revealing the land bridge stretching from Siberia to modern-day Alaska.听

New research dates that movement to no earlier than , which would mean Monte Verde鈥檚 first Americans would have had to hustle to get to Chile on Dillehay鈥檚 timeline.听

Scientists believe it would have taken people many generations to move down through the Americas, as they didn鈥檛 have a direct path mapped out, and glaciers might have deterred their movements.听

Some scientists have proposed that these early people moved southward along the Pacific coast, following a line of kelp forests that would have provided ample food. In this scenario, people might have island hopped along what has been dubbed a .听

Other ideas suggested have involved seafaring peoples, boating their way across oceans or between islands.听

According to the Clovis-first theory, people trekked down from the land bridge through a corridor that opened up in central North America when the glaciers were retreating some 13,000 years ago. But, as the dates suggest, that explanation doesn鈥檛 match with Dillehay鈥檚 data.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines 鈥 with humanity. Listening to sources 鈥 with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That鈥檚 Monitor reporting 鈥 news that changes how you see the world.
QR Code to When did people first arrive in South America?
Read this article in
/Science/2015/1120/When-did-people-first-arrive-in-South-America
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe