Bluer skies, less greenhouse gas. What happens after the pandemic?
Earlier this month, health care experts from across the United States gathered to address hundreds of journalists and policymakers by webinar. But their focus was not testing, nor vaccines, nor 鈥渉erd immunity.鈥� It was not even COVID-19, really. Instead, their focus was climate change.聽
鈥淲hile many see issues like climate change and biodiversity loss as far from what鈥檚 going on right now 鈥� I see this as the time to talk about it,鈥� said Aaron Bernstein, a pediatrician at Boston Children鈥檚 Hospital and a professor at Harvard Medical School. 鈥淐limate solutions are, in fact, pandemic solutions.鈥澛�
A few days later, economists and policy experts with the World Resources Institute held their own panel discussion. The message was similar, and the audience one of the largest in the organization鈥檚 history. The experience of and response to COVID-19, proclaimed expert after expert, was intricately tied to climate.
Why We Wrote This
In the pandemic, people worldwide are proving they can make personal sacrifices that benefit others. Researchers say now鈥檚 the time to push for more policies requiring similar efforts for climate change.
Indeed, increasing numbers of researchers and policymakers, scientists and health care practitioners, are looking at the coronavirus through an ecological lens. Whether they are focused on consumer behavioral shifts, changes in emission outputs, or policy decisions that might help or hurt long-term goals for green infrastructure, they are seeing in this moment a pivotal chance to address climate change.聽
鈥淎s we respond to the very imminent economic and health crisis, can we also tackle the climate and sustainability crisis?鈥� asked Manish Bapna, WRI鈥檚 managing director and executive vice president.
Editor鈥檚 note: As a public service,聽all our coronavirus coverage聽is free. No paywall.
There have been a number of short-term environmental shifts connected with how the world is coping with the pandemic. China鈥檚 carbon emissions dropped 18% between the beginning of February and mid-March, according to data compiled by the website CarbonBrief. Pollution over India has decreased dramatically, according to satellite images from NASA鈥檚 Earth Observatory. And in the U.S., a dramatic decrease in air travel, as well as a drop in vehicular travel, has also lowered emissions.聽
But many of these changes are temporary, researchers say, and may barely register on any long-term analysis of global carbon emissions. The drop in China鈥檚 carbon output, for instance, came alongside a lockdown over much of the country and a related plunge in factory operations. As the country reopens, says Fang Li, chief representative of the World Resources Institute in Beijing, emissions are expected to rebound along with the economy. After the global financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, Dr. Fang and others point out, global emissions grew rapidly. 聽
Renewing a focus
For many climate advocates, this is a reason to push green initiatives now. Environmentalists worry that unless policymakers focus on climate as part of their economic packages, the pandemic could lead to policy shifts that would undermine years of hard-won climate victories. Indeed, the Trump administration in late March announced that it would weaken Obama-era fuel standards that mandate increased fuel efficiencies for automobiles. It also announced last month that the Environmental Protection Agency will not enforce environmental regulations during the pandemic.聽
鈥淲hat we have to worry about is whether ... policy changes are going to be long term or short term,鈥� says Christopher Jones, director of the CoolClimate Network at the University of California, Berkeley. 鈥淚f we roll back standards and they remain in place when the economy comes back, we are going to have a real problem.鈥澛�
Researchers say that a green economic stimulus package could both help the U.S. ensure long-term sustainability and rebound from the crushing economic impact of the pandemic. (More than 26 million Americans have filed for unemployment benefits since March 15, according to the U.S. Labor Department.) Many environmentalists look at the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the stimulus package signed by President Barack Obama in 2009, as an example of how government initiatives can spur climate-friendly industry. That bill, which earmarked some $90 billion to promote green energy, is widely credited with launching the widespread renewable energy sector in the U.S.聽
鈥淓conomic measures should focus on climate as well as jobs and livelihood,鈥� Mr. Bapna said during the WRI panel.
But as Kenneth Gillingham, a professor at Yale University and a research fellow at the National Bureau of Economics Research, points out, the pandemic itself has slowed renewable energy efforts.
鈥淭here鈥檚 a slowing down of building new solar farms, of new wind facilities,鈥� he says. 鈥淪ome projects are hitting the pause button. Other projects may not happen for a long time.鈥澛�
And while there is hope for a green renewal, he suspects the future will be a good deal more nuanced.
鈥淓ntirely rebuilding our economy as a green economy? It鈥檚 a wonderful vision, but I don鈥檛 believe that鈥檚 what we鈥檒l likely see,鈥� he says.
Inequality, exacerbated
But a move toward environmental sustainability, says Dr. Bernstein, is going to be crucial not only for combatting a climate crisis, but for helping some of the people most impacted by the coronavirus. As he points out, both the pandemic and the impacts from climate change disproportionately affect people of color and other marginalized groups.聽
There is, he and others say, a hopeful lesson to be taken from the massive lifestyle and economic shifts seen across the globe in response to COVID-19. 聽For years, popular wisdom has said that people simply would not engage in the sort of behavior changes necessary to fight climate change; that they wouldn鈥檛 stop traveling, wouldn鈥檛 stop consuming, wouldn鈥檛 sacrifice material comforts and help save others who are most immediately at risk from climate change. Now, the response to the pandemic suggests otherwise.聽
鈥淲e are able to mobilize the entire global economy and population for an imminent threat,鈥� says Dr. Jones. 鈥淏oth climate change and this pandemic both affect the most vulnerable. But everybody is willing to make personal sacrifices to protect the most vulnerable. I think that鈥檚 quite new.鈥�
The question, he and others say, is whether people will be able to see climate change as a similarly 鈥渋mminent threat,鈥� deserving of action. While climate researchers look at the world鈥檚 increasingly frequent and severe natural disasters and see a direct connection to human behavior, research shows that most everyday people still feel disconnected from both the impacts and causes of climate change.聽
鈥淲e don鈥檛 experience risk properly,鈥� says Katharine Hayhoe, professor and director of the Texas Tech University Climate Science Center. 聽聽
But with the coronavirus, researchers say, there is a chance to shift.
鈥淚t can make people feel that what was previously unthinkable is plausible,鈥� Dr. Jones says. 鈥淭hey know what the experience feels like.鈥�
Editor鈥檚 note: As a public service,聽all our coronavirus coverage聽is free. No paywall.
