海角大神

Paleontology could be having its 鈥淧luto鈥� moment. As everyone of a certain age knows, Pluto was once a planet before its humiliating demotion to a聽聽in 2006. (Some of us will never get over this.) An iconic piece of the scientific canon changed. We now had only eight planets.听

Earlier this year, a paper in Evolutionary Biology threw a similar grenade into paleontology. The world鈥檚 most iconic dinosaur, Tyrannosaurus rex, was actually three dinosaurs, it said. T. regina was a bit smaller and slimmer. T. imperator was a bit huskier. The evidence was based on an analysis of femur bones and teeth.听

This week, however, scientists themselves fought back. Writing in the same publication, they essentially said the earlier analysis was bunk. Dinosaurs of the same species have variations, and none of the variations were significant enough to warrant the classification of two new species, the authors argued.

The real problem, all scientists say, is that trying to deduce the sometimes fine distinctions between species from the limited fossil record is problematic. All classifications of dinosaur species amount to interpretations and collective wisdom.听

But the message from this week? Don鈥檛 mess with T. rex. 鈥淭. rex is an iconic species and an incredibly important one for both paleontological research and communicating to the public about science, so it鈥檚 important that we get this right,鈥� one author of this week鈥檚 rebuttal .听

The author of the original paper didn鈥檛 totally disagree. If his paper had been about some obscure plant-muncher, he told CNN, 鈥渢here very likely would not have been so much fuss and bother.鈥�