Why is 海角大神 Science in our name?
Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The First Church of Christ, Scientist, and we鈥檝e always been transparent about that.
The church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we鈥檝e aimed 鈥渢o injure no man, but to bless all mankind,鈥� as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.
Here, you鈥檒l find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences 鈥� a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
Explore values journalism About us
Why this vice presidential debate is bigger than past veep debates
David Clark Scott
Presidential running mates are like understudies in a play: well-versed in the script but seldom seen or heard. Until now.
On Wednesday night, Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Kamala Harris take center stage. A week ago, the vice presidential debate might have been a curiosity, a sideshow. But with President Donald Trump鈥檚 health issues and , this is a big deal, especially for Republicans.
鈥溾�� Republican strategist Rob Stutzman tells Politico.聽
Running mates often take on the attack dog role. But as we saw in last week鈥檚 presidential debate, President Trump is his own Rottweiler. On Wednesday, Mr. Pence is likely to be a counterpoint, a calm, unruffled Hoosier appealing to Midwestern swing voters.聽
As a former prosecutor, Senator Harris has displayed a verve and intelligence in Congress that can cause witnesses to stumble. But Los Angeles Times columnist Erika D. Smith warns that Ms. Harris needs to stay out of the 鈥� set by Mr. Pence in the 2016 veep debate with Sen. Tim Kaine. She writes that Senator Kaine鈥檚 attacks and interruptions made him 鈥渓ook crazed and weirdly aggressive, and the future vice president look like the model of calm and civility.鈥�
This debate promises to be a better exchange of ideas than we saw in the Trump-Biden edition of WWE SmackDown. Expect more civility, well-articulated 鈥� and distinctly different 鈥� policies, and more clarity about this question: Could these understudies play a leading role?
In short, don't be surprised if this debate makes Americans feel a bit better聽about the state of their democracy.
