The president鈥檚 handling of his own health struggle has rapidly become an illustration of his government鈥檚 approach to managing a national crisis. How will history view it?
When the framers waxed hopeful about 鈥渁 more perfect Union,鈥 they surely didn鈥檛 expect popular unanimity on issues of national concern. But today American disunity seems to be deepening even during the kind of crisis that might once have been .听听
Fundamental differences have swelled since before 2020 and .听
鈥淭he point of American civic life is not to resolve these tensions,鈥 write Caroline Hopper and Laura Tavares in a 2019 that鈥檚 been making the rounds. 鈥淩ather, we need to understand their origins and grow smarter about engaging them.鈥澛
The writers are with the Aspen Institute Citizenship and American Identity Program and with Facing History and Ourselves, respectively. Those are two of the organizations collaborating on the Better Arguments Project.
What they prescribe is not just empathy 鈥 know the context of another鈥檚 views, listen actively, open up and be vulnerable. They call for more.听鈥淭ake winning off the table,鈥 they write. Drop the idea that one side must win at the other鈥檚 expense. And 鈥渂e open to transformation.鈥
A describes the friendship that an evangelical activist and an LGBTQ-marriage advocate found through the 鈥渄epolarizing group鈥 Braver Angels. Through exposure, they came to see each other as OK people committed to opposing causes.听
Too pat? Some in the story鈥檚 comment thread dismiss the amity, noting that hard-liners often seek to marginalize others 鈥 such as trans and nonbinary people 鈥 out of existence. But smarter engagement is a start.
鈥淧eople have to sit with some discomfort,鈥 said Kirk Schneider, a Braver Angels moderator, 鈥渋f we鈥檙e going to have sustainable peaceful coexistence with one another.鈥