The spotlight was on the U.S. House of Representatives today, which voted on rules for an impeachment inquiry. But the Senate holds the final say. We look at how key senators view the goings-on.
Today鈥檚 five hand-picked stories look at the Republican senators at the crux of impeachment, Russia鈥檚 environmental turn, Brexit鈥檚 potential impact on Britain鈥檚 most vulnerable, the gift of books to homeless people, and questions about how we see gangsters on film.
But first, so many people put so much thought into what they consume these days. As a meat-and-potatoes Midwesterner, I am often befuddled by Boston menus. Ras el hanout? Giardiniera? For a time, I wondered if meant 鈥済ood food.鈥
But there鈥檚 good in this trend. It exhorts me to be more thoughtful about how things are produced and the cascading effects on the world around us. The same is true of the climate change debate, in many ways. It鈥檚 about more thoughtful energy consumption. Then I wonder: Why don鈥檛 we do the same with the news we consume, which is essentially thought-food?
by the Solutions Journalism Network is fascinating. It says journalism that focuses on being constructive 鈥 not papering over problems but focusing on how we can fix them 鈥 makes readers feel more informed, more empowered, and more hopeful.
Readers saw no drop in journalistic standards, and the positive effects crossed gender and partisan lines. When was the last time you read about news reporting that evoked a positive reaction among both Republicans and Democrats?
There鈥檚 a long-standing line of thinking that it鈥檚 not journalism鈥檚 job to heal the world. True. It鈥檚 everyone鈥檚 job. But since 1908, we at the Monitor have felt journalism is an essential part of that equation.