It鈥檚 kind of a moment for Congress. Expressing belief in the importance of a deliberate pursuit of truth might reassure the public that integrity and order, democracy鈥檚 stabilizers, are intact.
Another week brought more questions about power.
Does a Facebook executive have too much of it? Do striking teachers have enough of it to ? Might the United States project it militarily in Syria (even as China flexes with a in the South China Sea)? [Update: After airstrikes Friday night, coordinated with Britain and France, the US hinted at .]
We can put faces to those stories. But a murkier power story saw some developments this week, too.
Fully two-thirds of tweets shared to popular websites were found by a Pew Research Center to have been directed by 鈥渂ots鈥 roaming without human input, changing conversations. Such rules-based bots are supported by a kind of artificial intelligence that lets them understand words in context. They鈥檙e a bridge to more formidable forms of AI 鈥 and to a deeper set of questions about and limits.
Facebook鈥檚 chief executive said this week that a would police its future content.
But the potential for AI鈥檚 broader use 鈥 including in warfare, policing, and other public-sector purposes 鈥 has observers clamoring for . (This week also happened to greet the world鈥檚 most valuable AI start-up, a that specializes in analyzing faces and other images.)
AI gets launched by human actors. Wedded to political authority, does it begin to wield a power that defies control?
鈥淚f governments deploy systems on human populations without frameworks for accountability, they risk losing touch with how decisions have been made,鈥 from a nonprofit called AINow, which tracks the technology鈥檚 social impact, 鈥渢hus rendering them unable to [detect] or respond to bias, errors, or other problems.鈥
Now to our five stories for your Friday, including聽protecting due process in Washington, changing young lives in Oklahoma, and pursuing justice without fear in Brazil.