Once a bloc of voters gets its candidate into office, satisfaction means deciding how the officeholder鈥檚 actions hold up against campaign promises. As this piece explains, unforeseen twists can be seen as breaches 鈥 or as trade-offs that work.聽
This week delivered a one-two wallop on 鈥渕edia鈥 in its broader sense.
In a major act of competitive consolidation, 聽(as was jokingly predicted on 鈥淭he Simpsons鈥 ).
And a federal ruling on net neutrality (a 3-2 vote at the FCC) threw more gatekeeper power to internet service providers.
Such shifts raise consumer anxiety, and big questions. Can laws adapt to changes in the media-tech landscape in an era of rapid evolution 鈥 and deregulation? Will the gatekeepers play fair? Providers insist that they won鈥檛 slow the flow of legal content. But New York鈥檚 attorney general is already leading a against what he calls an 鈥渋llegal rollback.鈥 The action moves next to the courts.
"The larger context,鈥 says Mark Trumbull, the Monitor鈥檚 economy editor, 鈥渕ay be the question of how diverse our digital lives will be." Some see the net neutrality ruling聽 of media consolidation, not a promoter of competition.聽
Then there are issues of equality. Many Americans simply breathe information. But there remains a major digital divide. It鈥檚 felt most acutely , where slow speeds or weak (or nonexistent) signals limit access. And it鈥檚 a particularly high-stakes concern for students facing homework that assumes easy access, as makes clear.
As I wrote back聽in May, the internet's now practically a utility. So what鈥檚 the best way to lay an information pipe to more people? And whose hands ought to be on the spigot?
Now to our five stories for your Friday, showing examples of introspection and reorientation on political policies, cultural practices, and the past.