What binds Colombian gangs to peace
Loading...
It isn鈥檛 often that strikingly different approaches to the same problem unfold in politics side by side, enabling societies to measure their relative merits. Yet as gang and drug cartel violence spreads into new areas of Latin America, countries across the region have become laboratories for two strategies that could not be less alike.
In El Salvador, the government has arrested more than 65,000 males accused of gang activity over the past year, some not yet teenagers. The homicide rate has plummeted, and public approval for President Nayib Bukele has soared. Leaders in neighboring countries like Honduras and Guatemala have taken note.
In Colombia, meanwhile, the government has pledged to bring 鈥渢otal peace鈥 to a country that has been destabilized for decades by criminal violence and guerrilla warfare. Skeptics have scoffed at that ambition. But the careful preservation of a delicate truce between rival street gangs this week has reinforced a useful lesson that innocence and the desire for peace are innate and renewable.
Shortly after his inauguration last August, Colombian President Gustavo Petro invited gang leaders in the port city of Buenaventura, a longtime crossroads of criminal violence, to sit together in talks. A shared recognition emerged almost immediately. As one gang delegate told Al Jazeera, the two sides agreed that 鈥渋t鈥檚 unfair that Buenaventura, having a people that is so peaceful, has so much violence and that it鈥檚 us that are killing each other. So [we] decided that this had to end.鈥
Months then passed without a homicide in the city. But earlier this month, the disappearance of one gang鈥檚 spokesperson threatened to push the two sides back toward conflict. A broad grouping of civil society organizations banded together to support a resolution. On Tuesday, the government announced that the truce had been restored. The agreement included a recognition that peace requires 鈥渃onfronting with institutional programs the roots of the deep inequality鈥 in Colombian society. 鈥
Total peace,鈥 Mr. Petro has argued, rests as much on tackling corruption and uneven economic opportunity, particularly for women and minorities, as it does on turning violent actors into peace partners.
In El Salvador, human rights groups note, Mr. Bukele鈥檚 approach to gang violence required first weakening the independence of democratic institutions like parliament and the judiciary. In Colombia, the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace has instructed all government agencies, including the military, to seek to build peace that 鈥減rotects the life and liberties of the citizens.鈥
If 鈥渨e sow love, [if] we dialogue from our differences and finally we manage to understand each other,鈥 Mr. Petro said in his Christmas message to the nation last December, 鈥渨e will reap in the work that each one of us does for our country.鈥
Across Latin America, an experiment in peacemaking is unfolding in dragnets and dialogue. One has set democratic values aside in the pursuit of security. The other recognizes that the common good rests on the ability of even those who perpetuate violence to express self-governance.