Teaching America鈥檚 past with a common goal
Last week, on the occasion of Constitution Day (Sept. 17), President Donald Trump tried to introduce a new issue into the election campaign: how to teach United States history. He announced the creation of a 鈥�1776 Commission鈥� that would 鈥渞estore聽patriotic education聽to our schools.鈥� He wants students to learn 鈥渢he magnificent truth鈥� of America鈥檚 past rather than a new approach in some schools that, he claims, tries 鈥渢o make students ashamed of their own history.鈥�
The federal government, of course, has very little control over K-12 curriculum in local education. Still, the new commission adds to other recent attempts to influence the teaching of U.S. history.
A bill in the House, for example, would put money toward helping 鈥渟tudents confront racism and prejudice in common discussions of literature and history.鈥� On the Senate side, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton proposes legislation to cut funding to any school district that relies on the 1619 Project. That refers to articles in The New York Times from last year that highlight the role of slavery in the nation鈥檚 beginnings and that are now being used by several schools as teaching tools. The 1619 Project鈥檚 creator, Nikole Hannah-Jones, says its purpose is to help Americans 鈥渢o work to live up to the majestic ideas of our founding.鈥�
Whether schools should emphasize 鈥渢he magnificent truth鈥� of America鈥檚 past (Mr. Trump) or highlight social injustices to further the country鈥檚 鈥渕ajestic ideals鈥� (New York Times) does not seem like an unbridgeable difference for local school boards and teachers. In fact, the teaching of history, along with civics education, often adjusts to current conditions. 鈥淒emocracy has to be born anew every generation, and education is its midwife,鈥� said famed educator John Dewey.
In particular, civics education 鈥� or the teaching of the rights and duties of citizenship 鈥� seems to be improving. Achievement levels in that topic rose for white, Black, and Hispanic students between 1998 and 2018, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
What can unite different approaches to teaching history is their common focus on instilling critical thinking skills 鈥� or the ability to discover and discern the facts and meaning of history.
Mr. Trump, for example, criticized the Smithsonian Institution for recently publishing a description of 鈥渨hiteness鈥� as an emphasis on 鈥渙bjective, rational linear thinking.鈥� The institution promptly took down the description. And the House funding bill requires anti-racist education to 鈥渟upport聽critical thinking聽skills.鈥�
In countries that rely on a system of self-government, training students to be honest seekers of historical truth 鈥� to distinguish fact from opinion and to rely on reason to draw conclusions 鈥� is a way to uncover and defeat any social ill. History itself shows the power of intelligence to lift up the thinking of society. Those mental faculties have long allowed Americans to face the past, learn from it, and chart a new course forward.
