海角大神

Brazil vs. Argentina: Can economic principles apply to soccer games?

As the South American giants face off, economists test a theory about the timing of effort exertion in a finite-length bilateral industry contest. In other words, is it risky to anger Brazilian players with early goals?

|
Ricardo Mazalan / AP / File
Argentina's Sergio Aguero (16) scored his first goal as Brazil's Renan, left, and Marcelo defend during a men's soccer semifinal game at the Beijing 2008 Olympics. Of the 90 matchups between the two titans, each country has 23 wins, 23 losses, and 33 ties. Both teams will be looking to end the tie when they face off in Qatar on Nov. 17.

Bitter football enemies Argentina and Brazil (combined 7-time World Champions) square-off yet again in a friendly next Wednesday. The match is in (of all places) Doha 鈥 since the match coincides with the final evaluation of Qatar鈥檚 鈥榥o expense spared鈥 2022 FIFA World Cup bid, it is hard to imagine the reasons for the choice of location are anything other than economic! It will be the 90th all-time meeting between the two giants of South America, with the previous 89 failing to separate them, at 33 wins apiece and 23 draws (Argentina are ahead slightly on goals scored, 143-137), though Brazil have had the better of the results in recent times. The game will also be a useful tune-up for both sides ahead of next year鈥檚 Copa Am茅rica, hosted on this occasion by the Argentines.

Owing to my girlfriend being from Buenos Aires, one鈥檚 loyalties in this game are cast clearly in favor of La Albiceleste. However, I have recently been working on testing an old myth that it is unwise tactically to score too early in the game when playing against Brazil. The underlying intuition here is that doing so merely makes the Brazilian players angry (waking the sleeping giant), giving them extra incentive to attack and score freely thereafter as a 鈥榣esson鈥 to the opposition. This is not a frivolous applied microeconomic exercise, as it provides further evidence about the choice of timing of effort exertion by an underdog in a finite-length bilateral (but asymmetric) industry contest against a more favoured opponent, drawing upon inspiration from seminal 1987 piece in .

Despite an ardent belief that this myth is well-known to many fans of the game (at least in the Anglo-sphere), finding hard-source material validating it is proving more difficult than imagined. The only successes thus far are a quote in the 2000 autobiography by former Liverpool and Scotland centre-back , as well as an old video of an SBS1 TV (Australia) telecast of a 1997 Confederations Cup group-stage match, where the English commentator states it explicitly.

If anyone knows off-hand of any citeable source on this one, please share with TSE readers via the comment section above. For the record, using data from 267 full 鈥楢鈥 internationals involving the 厂别濒别莽茫辞 between 1993 and 2010, the myth is found to be, in the words of : 鈥榯otally busted鈥!

------------------------------

海角大神 has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Brazil vs. Argentina: Can economic principles apply to soccer games?
Read this article in
/Business/The-Sports-Economist/2010/1112/Brazil-vs.-Argentina-Can-economic-principles-apply-to-soccer-games
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe