海角大神

The UK and the failure of Keynesian economics

The UK is ground zero for testing Keynesian economics. Guess what? It's not working. 

|
AFP/IMF/file
British economist Lord John Maynard Keynes (3rd l.) addresses the Bretton Woods Conference in July 1944. Keynes argued in favor of government spending during recessions and depressions, theory that has impacted the way governments around the world have responded to the 'great recession.'

The very birthplace of John Maynard Keynes, the United Kingdom, has become a petri dish in which to test his every economic prescription in a time of financial crisis. With a large and growing budget deficit, a declining pound, and accelerating inflation, the UK has been scrambling for a cure. And, for the most part, as in the US and elsewhere, the nation鈥檚 leadership has been looking to Keynes鈥 theories for guidance.

From a Bloomberg commentary by Matthew Lynn:

鈥淏ritain has been following the mainstream prescriptions of [Keynes'] followers more than any developed nation. It has cut interest rates, pumped up government spending, printed money like crazy, and nationalized almost half the banking industry.

鈥淪hort of digging Karl Marx out of his London grave, and putting him in charge, it is hard to see how the state could get more involved in the economy.

鈥淭he results will be dire. The economy is flat on its back, unemployment is rising, the pound is sinking, and the bond markets are bracketing the country with Greece and Portugal in the category marked 鈥榖ankruptcy imminent.鈥 At some point soon, even the most loyal disciples of Keynes will have to admit defeat, and accept that a radical change of direction is needed.鈥

Is that necessarily true? Keynesians have a tendency to refer back to the standby answer that if the remedy didn鈥檛 work, then it should have been tried earlier, or faster, or with more vigor. Lynn has an appropriate response for that:

鈥淭he Keynesian consensus is that things would have been far worse without the stimulus provided by government. And if the economy isn鈥檛 pumped up with inflated demand, it will collapse back into recession. If it鈥檚 not working, that just proves the stimulus should be even larger.

鈥淚t is the argument quacks always push: If the medicine isn鈥檛 working, increase the dosage.

鈥淎nd yet, reality has to intrude into this debate at some point. The deficit can鈥檛 get much bigger, interest rates can鈥檛 be cut much lower, and sterling can鈥檛 lose much more value.鈥

鈥淪timulating the economy isn鈥檛 working.鈥

Indeed. Given the sheer quantity of money pumped into the economy via stimulus and bailouts you would expect to see the UK having a much better recovery, even if it were still false and temporary like the current run-up in the US. It鈥檚 painful to consider the next leg down in the UK. The few brief signs of recovery to date have been frail, and have little potential to offer more than a brittle defense against the next downturn.

For more insight, read Matthew Lynn鈥檚 full commentary in his Bloomberg piece on how the .

------------------------------

海角大神 has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to The UK and the failure of Keynesian economics
Read this article in
/Business/The-Daily-Reckoning/2010/0226/The-UK-and-the-failure-of-Keynesian-economics
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe