海角大神

House Majority Leader on fiscal responsibility at the Brookings Institution today. He reaffirmed his strong faith in PAYGO (pay-as-you-go) budget rules as 鈥渟o valuable鈥� to the cause鈥揳lthough he acknowledged the large exemptions for current policy and at the same time brushed that qualification aside a little too easily (for my tastes).

But my favorite part was when he talked about how the politically easy choices are the economically devastating ones:

The most important lesson we can draw from the years of recklessness is this: when it comes to budgeting, what is politically easy is often fiscally deadly. It is easier to pay for tax cuts with borrowed money than with lower spending; easier to hide the true costs of war than to lay those costs before the people; easier to promise special cost-of-living adjustments than explain why an increase is not justified under the formula in law; easier to promise 95% of Americans that we won鈥檛 consider raising their taxes than to ask all Americans to contribute for the common good. Those kinds of easy choices are so often selfish choices鈥攂ecause they leave the chore of cleaning up to someone else. Easy choices may be popular鈥攂ut the popularity is bought on credit.

Washington鈥檚 behavior will only change when the incentives change: when voters demand more responsibility, and when the political price for easy choices rises sharply. As I said, I鈥檓 hopeful that just that is happening. But the public has a responsibility, too: to educate itself about the sources of the deficit and the range of realistic solutions鈥攏ot to demand that government continue to escalate entitlement payments and lower the deficit at the same time.

We can鈥檛 meet this challenge unless the public is ready to confront tough choices, and unless leaders in both parties are ready to be honest about tough choices. When deficit solutions meet resistance, which they will, and when they are painful, which they will be, it鈥檚 our job to explain why they are also correct鈥攁nd essential.

鈥淪teadfast Steny鈥� can talk like this without being a hypocrite, as he鈥檚 taken a lot of , even in his role as Majority Leader where he鈥檚 supposed to be worried about the politics.

UPDATE Tuesday morning: The NYTimes鈥� that Steny bravely 鈥渃hallenged the sacred cows in his own party鈥� by suggesting some fairly specific options to damp down spending on Social Security and Medicare. My observation is that for most in Steny鈥檚 鈥渙wn party鈥濃�搃ncluding the President himself鈥搕he (Bush) tax cuts for that very-broadly-defined middle class of households with incomes under $250,000 have (bizarrely) become another 鈥渟acred cow鈥� of theirs (the Democratic Party). And that鈥檚 the problem. How can the Democrats work in a bipartisan manner with Republicans if what they would otherwise negotiate on鈥搃n terms of 鈥淚鈥檒l give up this (entitlement spending) if you give up that (tax cuts)鈥濃�搃s not really bargaining for anything they really want?

.

------------------------------

海角大神 has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.