海角大神

2012 budget is full of contradictions

When Washington finally turns its attention back to Obama's 2012 proposal, people will start to notice all the conflicting tax proposals.

|
Jim Young / Reuters / File
U.S. President Barack Obama holds a news conference in at the White House in December 2010. Obama's 2012 budget proposal has been overshadowed by other events lately, but soon Washington will pick it back up and notice that it's confusing.

President Obama鈥檚 budget proposal has been overshadowed by the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, a new military action in Libya, and continuing battles over the 2011 budget, not to mention tiger blood and March Madness.

But one of these days, Washington will turn its attention back to a core piece of business 鈥 budgeting for 2012 and beyond. To help with that process, my colleagues at the Tax Policy Center recently released an .

The report discusses the president鈥檚 numerous proposals and puts them into larger budget context.

As I鈥檝e noted before, one unfortunate feature of our tax system is that it is riddled with uncertainty. There are now major temporary cuts in the taxes on individual incomes, corporate income, payrolls, and estates. As a result, it can sometimes be confusing to talk about potential policy changes. Should changes be measured relative to tax law as now written? Relative to the tax law in place in 2011? Or something in between?

The first table in the TPC report measures the ten-year budget impact of the president鈥檚 proposals against three benchmarks. Relative to current law, the president is proposing a $2.4 trillion tax cut over the next decade. That鈥檚 because he would extend most of the tax cuts that expire at the end of 2012, including the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for 鈥渕iddle-income鈥 taxpayers, the AMT patch, and the estate tax at 2009 levels. Those extensions total $3.1 trillion, which he would partly offset by $700 billion in revenue increases.

Relative to current policy 鈥 which we define as 2011 tax law excluding the payroll tax holiday and temporary investment incentives 鈥 the president鈥檚 proposal turns out to be a $2.0 trillion tax increase. That鈥檚 because he would not extend certain provisions of 2011 tax law, most notably the lower rates on 鈥渦pper-income鈥 taxpayers and the lower estate tax.

Confusingly, the president uses neither of these benchmarks to measure his proposals. Instead, he assumes that the upper-income tax cuts expire, while the middle-income ones get extended. Under that assumption, the president鈥檚 tax proposal amounts to a $700 billion tax increase.

So there you have it. Depending on how you look at it, President Obama is proposing to cut taxes by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, raise them by $700 billion, or raise them by $2.0 trillion. It all depends on your benchmark.

------------------------------

海角大神 has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to 2012 budget is full of contradictions
Read this article in
/Business/Donald-Marron/2011/0324/2012-budget-is-full-of-contradictions
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe