ESPN: Wild times behind the scenes are laid bare in "Those Guys Have All the Fun"
It鈥檚 a story even sports spurners will appreciate. The rise of an American corporate and cultural colossus, from a $9,000 cable TV start-up that no one thought would succeed to a media leviathan that encompasses six domestic cable networks, 46 international networks, a radio station, websites, a magazine, and a restaurant chain, and is worth more than the NBA, the NHL, and Major League Baseball combined.
It鈥檚 the story of ESPN and it鈥檚 contained in the 763-page behemoth, 鈥淭hose Guys Have All the Fun: Inside the World of ESPN,鈥� by Pulitzer-Prize-winning former Washington Post TV critic Tom Shales and former journalist and cable executive James Miller.
The editorial genius behind 鈥淟ive From New York: An Uncensored History of Saturday Night Live,鈥� Shales and Miller used a similar method, relying on more than 550 interviews compiled into a seamless oral history, to tell the story of ESPN鈥檚 stratospheric rise.
And what a rise. 鈥淭hose Guys鈥� is peppered with revelations about big egos and even bigger libidos, salacious gossip, sexual escapades, drugs and booze, backstabbing, and plenty of backstage drama.
As knowingly implied, 鈥淚nevitably, the most straightforward history of ESPN will cause some queasiness in Bristol.鈥� (ESPN is headquartered in Bristol, Conn.)
One reason: ESPN鈥檚 infamously male-dominated culture. 鈥淭he culture in Bristol was intense, and intensely male,鈥� in its review of the book. 鈥淏etting on games was epidemic. There were drugs. There was sexual harassment. There was sex in the stairwells. 鈥榃e had no social life because we worked all the time,鈥� an early director of production says. 鈥楾here were a lot of interoffice romances going on because you didn't have a chance to meet anybody else....鈥� 鈥�
And according to Shales and Miller, in the early days, sexual harassment was rampant.
鈥淣obody has it tougher than the women trying to clear a path through the unreconstructedly male jungle of professional sports in general and ESPN in particular,鈥� wrote . 鈥�Karie Ross, an early anchor, describes male staffers flipping on the Playboy Channel just to watch her reaction; she wound up making a speech about sexual harassment in the cafeteria. Julie Anderson recalls getting hit on by Mike Tyson during his rape trial.鈥�
praises the book for its warts-and-all portrayal of ESPN鈥檚 larger-than-life personalities. 鈥淔amiliar figures are sketched out brilliantly,鈥� . 鈥�Keith Olbermann is praised as the brightest SportsCenter anchor and described as 'dark' and 'a tortured genius.' (Sound familiar, MSNBC?) Chris Berman comes across as a pompous blowhard, yelling at Tony Kornheiser and dressing down junior employees. Rising star Bill Simmons is by turns rebellious (criticizing his corporate bosses), loyal (defending Kornheiser for "Monday Night Football") and petulant (refusing all editorial advice on his column).鈥�
But in spite of the drama, the bad behavior and backstabbing, ESPN was and is, ultimately, a slam-dunk, scored by a bunch of people just doing what they love and not taking it too seriously. That, suggests Shales and Miller, is its genius.
鈥淏y the end of the book (at 763 pages, it could have been tighter) you're amazed at the disconnect between the chaos behind the scenes and the relatively slick end product,鈥� writes. 鈥淚t was amateur hour all the time, but the product somehow remained professional.鈥�
It鈥檚 also the genius of 鈥淭hose Guys Have All the Fun.鈥�
Weaving 550 interviews into a seamless, entertaining, oral story (more a story than a history, reviewers have suggested) is harder than it seems 鈥� much easier, in fact, to craft a narrative in one鈥檚 own words. But Shales and Miller were able to get hundreds of people, from cameramen to on-air personalities (Mike Tyson), even Barack Obama, to talk. Even more impressive, reviewers say, it works 鈥� most of the time.
鈥淭he quotes flow seamlessly, and the voices are fresh and vibrant, but there are moments you wish the authors would referee competing stories directly, and the book could use a stronger organizational hand,鈥� . 鈥� 鈥楩un鈥� is a major accomplishment. The depth and breadth of the interviews make it not only the definitive account of ESPN's first three decades but one of the best books yet on how cable shaped American culture."
Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.
Join the Monitor's book discussion on and .
