Our Times: The Age of Elizabeth II
A.N. Wilson begins Our Times: The Age of Elizabeth II with a disclaimer, telling readers that his book isn鈥檛 really about the current queen of England, although it covers the years of her reign, which began in 1952 and 鈥渕ight well rival that of Queen Victoria in longevity.鈥�
But even though it isn鈥檛 a royal biography, Wilson鈥檚 book uses Elizabeth II鈥檚 years on the throne as a convenient window into the evolution of modern Britain, a period of change that the author finds breathtaking.
Wilson鈥檚 topic is broad, but he鈥檚 accustomed to working on a large canvas. 鈥淥ur Times鈥� is the third volume in a trilogy of British history that began with 鈥淭he Victorians鈥� and was followed by 鈥淎fter the Victorians,鈥� the entire series produced in just six years.
One of the reasons that Wilson can move quickly is that he isn鈥檛 exhaustively inclusive. Subtracting notes and pictures, the text of 鈥淥ur Times鈥� comes in at around 400 pages 鈥� less than 70 pages for each of the six decades covered in Wilson鈥檚 narrative.
Using pop culture to illuminate an era
A novelist and biographer whose works have included studies of John Milton, C.S. Lewis, and the apostle Paul, Wilson proves especially adept at using popular culture to explain the past. The intrigues of Parliament, No. 10 Downing Street, and Buckingham Palace get their due in 鈥淥ur Times,鈥� but Wilson does his best work here in holding up a period book, song, or TV show like a bright shard to imply the era鈥檚 larger whole.
He opens 鈥淥ur Times,鈥� for example, by pointing to J.R.R. Tolkein鈥檚 鈥�Lord of the Rings鈥� series, which debuted in the 1950s, as an elegy for a Britain that would become more open and modern over subsequent decades, yet less cohesive.
鈥淏ritain as a political entity survived in this period,鈥� Wilson writes, 鈥渂ut it was to be less 鈥楤ritish.鈥� 鈥�
Wilson鈥檚 ginger use of quotes around 鈥淏ritish鈥� suggests a vagueness about national identity that, in his view, will grow cloudier as new generations of immigrants continue to reshape Great Britain.
Here鈥檚 Wilson again: 鈥淭hough it is certainly true that some of these immigrants have helped Britain prosper, it is equally inescapable that they have changed the character and composition of whole areas of Britain 鈥� and not always for the better. Eager to be tolerant, governments did not insist that these immigrants learn the language or integrate properly.鈥�
Wilson takes particular issue with what he regards as the spread of radical Islam within Britain, which includes followers who are, in the author鈥檚 opinion, 鈥渋ntent on destroying Great Britain itself.鈥�
Not that Wilson favors a return to the social orthodoxies that defined Britain when Elizabeth II was crowned. He writes with disdain of past
racial intolerance, while more recent gains in rights for gays and women in Britain inspire Wilson鈥檚 applause. Wilson also offers a thumbs-up for advances in British healthcare and the general standard of living during the past half-century, but beyond those caveats, his mood is generally dour.
History with a hint of theater
As in previous installments in his British history trilogy, Wilson makes dyspepsia into a cottage industry. In chapters bearing such titles as 鈥淎 Portrait of Decay,鈥� 鈥淭he Decline of the Roman Catholic Church,鈥� and 鈥淭he End of Harold Wilson,鈥� he bangs a dirge of decline that recalls the darkness of Edward Gibbon.
If the author of 鈥淭he History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire鈥� comes to mind when reading 鈥淥ur Times,鈥� perhaps it鈥檚 because, like Gibbon, Wilson uses a style of storytelling that鈥檚 deeply opinionated, assertive, and enlivened by a keen sense of theater. This is history told not with cool textbook neutrality, but in the voice of a wry uncle holding forth from his armchair.
Wilson鈥檚 views are prickly and sometimes exasperating, but they鈥檙e never dull. He offers as self-evident the observation that Bob Dylan is a better musical artist and performer than The Beatles, and he blames the political activism of the Fab Four for creating 鈥渢he annoying legacy that entertainers, rather than being humble enough to entertain, should inflict their half-baked views of economics, meteorology and politics to those who had been gullible enough to buy their records.鈥�
If, as Wilson asserts, the Great Britain of Elizabeth II鈥檚 youth no longer exists, then 鈥淥ur Times鈥� has ushered it out with a bang, not a whimper.
Danny Heitman, a columnist for The Baton Rouge Advocate, is the author of 鈥淎 Summer of Birds: John James Audubon at Oakley House.鈥�
